This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ
- From: Eric Gallager <egall at gwmail dot gwu dot edu>
- To: Bernd Edlinger <bernd dot edlinger at hotmail dot de>
- Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:19:49 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <AM4PR0701MB2162AAFF4FE8056C74091024E4E60@AM4PR0701MB2162.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
On 9/5/16, Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> wrote:
> On 05.09.2016 17:13, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > As discussed. I think I should ask a Global reviewer to approve this
> > one. For obvious reasons I haven't included the diffs to the deleted
> > gcc/java and libjava directories. The whole tree, post GCJ-deletion,
> > is at svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-deletion-branch
> > if anyone would like to try it.
> >
> > Andrew.
> >
> >
> > 2016-09-05 Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
> >
> > * Makefile.def: Remove libjava.
> > * Makefile.tpl: Likewise.
> > * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
> > * configure.ac: Likewise.
> > * configure: Likewise.
> > * gcc/java: Remove.
> > * libjava: Likewise.
>
>
> I think you can remove libffi as well, right?
>
>
I think Go uses libffi as well; for further discussion see bug 11660:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11660
(people there seem to think ObjC uses libffi, too, but I haven't
noticed it doing that myself)