This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA/JDWP] Implement more VMMethod methods

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>
Cc: Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 25 Jan 2007 10:30:07 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFA/JDWP] Implement more VMMethod methods
References: <45B901F0.6060706@redhat.com> <m3r6tjdnw5.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <45B90697.1090407@redhat.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

Keith> Hmm. So why did jdwpVMInitCB require it? That's just a static function
Keith> in natVMVirtualMachine.cc. [That's what confused me about Marco's
Keith> problems with the VM_INIT patch last week.]

It is declared as JNICALL.  But I assume that was added to the
declaration at the same time as it was to the definition?  Anyway, it
should not need this AFAICS.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA/JDWP] Implement more VMMethod methods
  - From: Keith Seitz

References:
- [RFA/JDWP] Implement more VMMethod methods
  - From: Keith Seitz
- Re: [RFA/JDWP] Implement more VMMethod methods
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [RFA/JDWP] Implement more VMMethod methods
  - From: Keith Seitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]