This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA/JDWP] Implement more VMMethod methods

From: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:35:51 -0800
Subject: Re: [RFA/JDWP] Implement more VMMethod methods
References: <45B901F0.6060706@redhat.com> <m3r6tjdnw5.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

Tom Tromey wrote:

Nope.  That is only needed for functions that are declared JNICALL in
jvmti.h (well, or anywhere, but this is the typical place).

Hmm. So why did jdwpVMInitCB require it? That's just a static function in natVMVirtualMachine.cc. [That's what confused me about Marco's problems with the VM_INIT patch last week.]

I'd prefer it in a header. How about jvmti-int.h?

Will do.

Keith

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA/JDWP] Implement more VMMethod methods
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- [RFA/JDWP] Implement more VMMethod methods
  - From: Keith Seitz
- Re: [RFA/JDWP] Implement more VMMethod methods
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]