This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [JVMTI] RFA: JVMTI Stack Tracing

Hans Boehm wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Kyle Galloway wrote:


I should have set, SA_RESTART, I'll change that.  As for SIGTRAP, there
was no real reason, I could use any of a bunch of different signals,
maybe SIGPWR would be a better choice?


I'm missing context here.  But won't this conflict with the GC's use of
SIGPWR?


It would. I almost flagged this myself, but I didn't have the time to verify which signals the GC uses.

Would it be possible to use a Real-Time signal? That might not be as portable as using a 'Standard' signal.

David Daney

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]