This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Patch: Add test for PR20418.
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
- Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:46:57 -0700
- Subject: Re: Patch: Add test for PR20418.
- References: <4463760E.3030203@avtrex.com>
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:36:14AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> In my quest to get PR testsuite/24128 fixed, I need a test that produces
> ice-on-invalid-code where the xfail fail contains 'shouldfail'. Since
> the gcj developers have been very diligent, none of these exist.
>
> Janis Johnson said in a message on gcc-patches@ that she would take a
> look at the testsuite driver if we had a test case that exposed this
> problem.
>
> With the goal of getting the testsuite fixed I would like to add this
> new test case. It is a test case for an open ice-on-invalid-code that
> has no test in the testsuite. The code comes from the PR, but is
> renamed to more closely match the testsuite naming conventions.
>
> I would like to commit this as should fail (even though gcj currently
> ices on it). Currently the testsuite will report this as a PASS. When
> the testsuite driver is fixed we can change this to an XFAIL.
>
> Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu. The new test ICEs, but is reported as a
> PASS (which is the whole point to this exercise).
>
> OK to commit?
You don't need to commit it for my sake, I can add it to my testing tree.
Janis