Patch: Add test for PR20418.

[David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>]

In my quest to get PR testsuite/24128 fixed, I need a test that produces 
ice-on-invalid-code where the xfail fail contains 'shouldfail'.  Since 
the gcj developers have been very diligent, none of these exist.

Janis Johnson said in a message on gcc-patches@ that she would take a 
look at the testsuite driver if we had a test case that exposed this 
problem.

With the goal of getting the testsuite fixed I would like to add this 
new test case. It is a test case for an open ice-on-invalid-code that 
has no test in the testsuite.  The code comes from the PR, but is 
renamed to more closely match the testsuite naming conventions.

I would like to commit this as should fail (even though gcj currently 
ices on it).  Currently the testsuite will report this as a PASS.  When 
the testsuite driver is fixed we can change this to an XFAIL.

Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu.  The new test ICEs, but is reported as a 
PASS (which is the whole point to this exercise).

OK to commit?

2006-05-11  David Daney  <ddaney@avtrex.com>

	* testsuite/libjava.compile/PR20418.java: New.
	* testsuite/libjava.compile/PR20418.xfail: New.

Index: testsuite/libjava.compile/PR20418.java
===================================================================
--- testsuite/libjava.compile/PR20418.java	(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/libjava.compile/PR20418.java	(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+public class PR20418
+{
+  public static void main( String[] args)
+  {
+    java.io.File = new java.io.File( "junk");
+  }
+}
Index: testsuite/libjava.compile/PR20418.xfail
===================================================================
--- testsuite/libjava.compile/PR20418.xfail	(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/libjava.compile/PR20418.xfail	(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+shouldfail