This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR java/27025: ICE on simple initializer

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 04 Apr 2006 12:02:19 -0600
Subject: Re: PR java/27025: ICE on simple initializer
References: <17458.40535.399466.5858@zapata.pink> <4432AA7D.4030508@avtrex.com> <17458.44166.358224.168117@zapata.pink> <17458.44573.482281.505869@zapata.pink>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

Andrew> Hmm.  Thinking some more, it might be that a Java implementation is
Andrew> required to compile ("foo"+2) as the string constant "foo2", and the
Andrew> JLS section you quoted suggests that it is.

Yes, this is required.

Tom

References:
- PR java/27025: ICE on simple initializer
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: PR java/27025: ICE on simple initializer
  - From: David Daney
- Re: PR java/27025: ICE on simple initializer
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: PR java/27025: ICE on simple initializer
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]