This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR java/27025: ICE on simple initializer

From: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:18:53 -0700
Subject: Re: PR java/27025: ICE on simple initializer
References: <17458.40535.399466.5858@zapata.pink>

Andrew Haley wrote:

gcj assumes that in the operation (A + B), where A and B are
constants, the result must be a constant.  It ain't necessaarily so.

Can you tell my how to reconcile your claim with JLS (v2 or v3) section 15.28? Especially in relation to the testcase in the PR.

I am not saying that your fix is incorrect or in conflict with the JLS, but it seems like a surprising claim.

David Daney

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PR java/27025: ICE on simple initializer
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- PR java/27025: ICE on simple initializer
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]