Re: [RFA] gnu.gcj.jdwp.transport: packet classes

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> writes:

Keith> That sounds reasonable to me. I presume other maintainers agree? If so,
Keith> I can refactor the code and update the copyright notices.

Yeah, let's do that.

Keith> Of course, this now begs the question: So there seems to be growing
Keith> opinion that this should go into classpath. Shall we consider moving
Keith> this discussion over there?

Yes.  I posted a note the other day actually, and Michael and Dalibor
were in favor.  So let's go ahead on that assumption.  If someone
objects loudly we can always rename it back.

I'll see about getting you a Classpath account so this can be done as
easily as possible.  Send me the name of your Savannah account (and
make one if you don't have one, see http://savannah.gnu.org/ ) and
I'll follow up.

Tom