This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] gnu.gcj.jdwp.transport: packet classes

From: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>
To: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>
Cc: GCJ Patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 12:25:37 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFA] gnu.gcj.jdwp.transport: packet classes
References: <1117228949.4460.29.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> <20050528073918.GC4508@asterix.konqueror.de>

On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 09:39 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:

> This code seems to independant from VM and should move the a package that
> can be shared with GNU classpath from start. I would suggest gnu.classpath.jdwp.*.
> 
> What do you think?

That sounds reasonable to me. I presume other maintainers agree? If so,
I can refactor the code and update the copyright notices.

Of course, this now begs the question: So there seems to be growing
opinion that this should go into classpath. Shall we consider moving
this discussion over there?

Keith

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] gnu.gcj.jdwp.transport: packet classes
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- [RFA] gnu.gcj.jdwp.transport: packet classes
  - From: Keith Seitz
- Re: [RFA] gnu.gcj.jdwp.transport: packet classes
  - From: Michael Koch

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]