This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure on non-C99 targets

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>,java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:41:15 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure on non-C99 targets
References: <200411282233.03282.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <41AB5CDA.3070208@avtrex.com> <m3fz2ssgt8.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

> I think the problem is that, while GCC is C99, the target platform's
> headers may not be.  So, intptr_t may not be defined.  As far as I
> know, GCC itself doesn't ship a header which defines this.

I don't think that GCC is C99 in default mode.  In any cases, even in C99 
mode, it doesn't provide int32_t, int64_t, intptr_t and the likes.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

References:
- [PATCH] Fix build failure on non-C99 targets
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure on non-C99 targets
  - From: David Daney
- Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure on non-C99 targets
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]