This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure on non-C99 targets

From: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:31:06 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure on non-C99 targets
References: <200411282233.03282.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <m3u0r8si9d.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>>"Eric" == Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> writes:
> 
> 
> Eric> Libjava builds are again broken on non-C99 targets.  The
> Eric> following patch is sufficient to restore them.  Tested on
> Eric> sparc64-sun-solaris2.9 and sparc-sun-solaris2.[5678].  Is it
> Eric> good enough?
> 
> This is fine, thanks.
> 

Isn't libgcj always compiled with gcc/g++/gcj?  In all stage one builds (or
cross-compiles) that I have done, that is the case.  I don't see why the
host compiler would ever be used for compiling libgcj.

Am I missing something?

David Daney.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure on non-C99 targets
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure on non-C99 targets
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- [PATCH] Fix build failure on non-C99 targets
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure on non-C99 targets
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]