This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: e_pow.c bug

From: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
Cc: Steve Moshier <steve at moshier dot net>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:42:58 -0400
Subject: Re: e_pow.c bug
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404110939430.21214@moshier.net> <407AB2DB.4000009@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404121230050.24434@moshier.net> <1081788789.13170.643.camel@elsschot.wildebeest.org>

Mark Wielaard wrote:

I looked into this last week for GNU Classpath and the spec actually says we need to have the exact same bugs as one specific fdlibm release...

Should be follow their buggy spec?

Given that the spec seems quite explicit about it, and current implementations still use the buggy behaviour, I think we should continue with the status quo at this time. I'd be interested to see what happens with a bug report filed against the JRE, though.

Regards

Bryce

Follow-Ups:
- Re: e_pow.c bug
  - From: Steve Moshier

References:
- e_pow.c bug
  - From: Steve Moshier
- Re: e_pow.c bug
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: e_pow.c bug
  - From: Steve Moshier
- Re: e_pow.c bug
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]