This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: PATCH to optimize two Channels methods
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- Cc: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>, Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 09 Mar 2004 08:51:30 -0700
- Subject: Re: PATCH to optimize two Channels methods
- References: <200403091403.i29E3sk31136@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Earnshaw <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Richard> Breaking the build prevents almost any development on the
Richard> compiler and I don't consider that acceptable. Constantly
Richard> tweaking complex build scripts to leave out broken components
Richard> is a non-starter.
As far as I know, libgcj falls under the same rules as the rest of the
compiler, see http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html. In particular, 48
hours after a regression is introduced, you may back out the patch.