This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Lightweight peer implementation

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim at redhat dot com>
Cc: Scott Gilbertson <scottg at mantatest dot com>, Bryce McKinlay <bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz>, GCJ Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 16 Aug 2003 23:29:39 -0600
Subject: Re: Lightweight peer implementation
References: <0968DFD6-CC56-11D7-8F3E-003065F97F7C@mckinlay.net.nz><00fb01c360e0$9b2156a0$3c16a8c0@mantatest.com><1060794968.12238.1235.camel@tortoise.toronto.redhat.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Tom" == Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@redhat.com> writes:

Tom> OK, here is another patch that builds on Scott's.  I've left the
Tom> Component null checks alone for now.  The patch moves GLightweightPeer
Tom> to gnu.java.awt.peer and implements some of the missing ComponentPeer
Tom> methods.

This looks good to me.  Please check it in.

It would be nice if the javadoc for the new class explained its role
in things -- sort of a summary of the stuff worked out during this
discussion.

Tom

References:
- Re: Lightweight peer implementation
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Lightweight peer implementation
  - From: Scott Gilbertson
- Re: Lightweight peer implementation
  - From: Thomas Fitzsimmons

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]