This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Patch for Review: _Jv_TempUTFString + JV_TEMP_UTF_STRING


Hi Tom,

(This is Mohan Embar writing from outer space.)

>That said, Mohan, please make this change and put it in.

Did you take a look at this follow-up post?: 

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00392.html

I found that the timings for _Jv_AllocBytes() were higher than
for _Jv_Malloc() (the times reported are in milliseconds - I forgot
to mention that in the previous post), especially on Win32.
While, as Bryce mentioned, we are talking about the fallback
case where the stack-allocated buffer doesn't work, I still
felt like this was a point worth mentioning.

Having said this, do you still want me to make the change
and put this in?
=====================================
Mohan Embar
http://www.thisiscool.com/
http://www.animalsong.org/


_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]