This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: Moving native code in java.net into architecture dependant files


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am Montag, 17. März 2003 09:47 schrieb Andrew Haley:

>  > > If not, the naming conventions seem to establish the
>  > > equivalence between the eCos platform and java.net
>  > > functionality being disabled. Is this confusing from a naming
>  > > standpoint? What if instead of natInetAddressEcos.cc (for
>  > > example), you had natInetAddressNoNet.cc and made another
>  > > variable called NET_PLATFORM which factored in not only
>  > > PLATFORM, but also whether enable_java_net was "no"?
>  >
>  > As I understood it Ecos is more used as a synomynon for a
>  > non-supported architecture. At least I think I read that on the
>  > lists (a comment from Tom I think).
>
> For the time being, yes.  But if someone submits a patch that
> properly enables networking on eCos it'll be welcome.

What do you think about Mohan's idea of introducing NET_PLATFORM ?

Michael
- -- 
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+dZA0WSOgCCdjSDsRAlZfAJ9TDRlehfInnARPCBXi0PaVq8rOYQCgnQiH
AqEQDHhhDEl1Tj3JSylAnNo=
=mg0U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]