This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: libstdc++ multilibs installed where gcc won't find them
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Jan 2003 23:38:12 +0100
- Subject: Re: libstdc++ multilibs installed where gcc won't find them
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
- References: <orwuksl850.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20030127103953.18383991.bkoz@redhat.com><or4r7u8pzu.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><m3znpm1ogg.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><orznpm78tz.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><m3iswa1j7w.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><oradhm7453.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><m3vg0az6se.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><orr8ay5jkx.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:
[...]
| > Obvsiouly, the reasons why that patch was nominated wasn't obvious to
| > me (catching up tons of mails) and I was under the impression that it
| > is just a matter of "lineing up versions".
|
| Actually, it requires something similar to this (that I'm testing) to
| line up all other target libraries with libgcc and (now) libstdc++.
| Would you rather have the libstdc++-v3 part reverted, so that it
| remains consistent with all other target libraries (except libgcc),
| stay as is or get something like this additional patch in. This is
| actually for mainline and I'm still testing it, but I wouldn't mind
| porting it over to 3.2. As for mainline and 3.3, does any of the
| maintainers of libf2c, libobjc and libjava object to it?
You just convinced me it was a serious bug; now, you are not going to
try to change (again) my mind; are you? ;-)
I would apprecaite if you could backport the patch to 3.2 to line up all
affected target libraries with libgcc.
Thanks,
-- Gaby