This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: {Patch] java.net network functions
- From: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>
- To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:26:29 +0100
- Subject: Re: {Patch] java.net network functions
- References: <200211211355.gALDtUh07978@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
Am Donnerstag, 21. November 2002 14:55 schrieb Richard Earnshaw:
> The difference is that previously we didn't depend on sys/socket.h
> existing (which is why it's wrapped in autoconf include guards).
> But with your change we now assume it does exist (we use a function
> from it even if we didn't include it). A newlib libc does not
> provide this header so we then get the error.
The question is what header to include to get socket on a newlib
system ? And I wonder how that worked before as there where an
unconditional inclusion of socket.h and nothing special to get
socket() on a newlib system. I just moved code to a different
location. I really wonder how that can break this way.
Michael
--
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
GPG-key: http://konqueror.dyndns.org/~mkoch/michael.gpg