This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Get rid of libzgcj and libgcjgc libraries

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:20:14 +1200
Subject: Re: Get rid of libzgcj and libgcjgc libraries
References: <3C93E2BA.4000206@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <org02yrg28.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

Alexandre Oliva wrote:

>On Mar 16, 2002, Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> wrote:
>
>>	* libtool-version: Increment .so version number.
>>
>
>AFAICT, no interfaces have been removed from the library, so it would
>be safe to set AGE to 1, such that the new library remains
>binary-compatible with the old one, and their SONAMEs will remain the
>same.
>

Well, we want to change the SONAME anyway for the 3.1 release - since 
libgcj is not binary compatible with the libgcj in 3.0.x. Now seems as 
good time as any to do it.

regards

Bryce.

References:
- Get rid of libzgcj and libgcjgc libraries
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Get rid of libzgcj and libgcjgc libraries
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]