This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Get rid of libzgcj and libgcjgc libraries
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 17 Mar 2002 19:21:35 -0300
- Subject: Re: Get rid of libzgcj and libgcjgc libraries
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <3C93E2BA.4000206@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
On Mar 16, 2002, Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> wrote:
> * libtool-version: Increment .so version number.
AFAICT, no interfaces have been removed from the library, so it would
be safe to set AGE to 1, such that the new library remains
binary-compatible with the old one, and their SONAMEs will remain the
same.
In case you haven't done so already, you may want to have a look at
the `Versioning' section of the libtool manual, particularly to the
node `Updating version info'.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer