This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: WIN-28.1: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
To: Adam Megacz <patches at lists dot megacz dot com>
Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 14:08:38 +1300
Subject: Re: WIN-28.1: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
References: <86d6yto40o.fsf@megacz.com> <3C80491A.40708@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <86lmdba9yd.fsf@megacz.com> <3C80547B.5020100@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <86bse6r3w7.fsf@megacz.com> <86elixo009.fsf_-_@megacz.com> <87k7sp2st9.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <86bse1dy6z.fsf@megacz.com>

Adam Megacz wrote:

>Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
>
>>Shouldn't these just be `0', `1', `2'?
>>

My apologies as well, I obviously didn't read the patch very carefully 
when reviewing it!

regards

Bryce.

References:
- WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: WIN-28: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
  - From: Adam Megacz
- WIN-28.1: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: WIN-28.1: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: WIN-28.1: fix POSIX file descriptor numbering assumptions
  - From: Adam Megacz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]