This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi! Short version: OK to use Git branch name devel/omp/gcc-9 for what used to be Subversion openacc-gcc-9-branch? We used to have Subversion openacc-gcc-9-branch etc. branches: "for collaborative development of OpenACC support and related functionality, such as offloading support. The branch is based on gcc-9-branch." First thing, going forward, we intend to rename the prefix from "openacc" to "omp" so as to widen the development scope to also include OpenMP etc.: "Offloading and Multi Processing". Then, in the new Git world order, a direct translation would result in Git branch name devel/omp-gcc-9 (without "branch" postfix; being based on releases/gcc-9). Would it maybe be better instead of hyphen-separated devel/omp-gcc-9 to use slash-separated devel/gcc-9/omp (put "gcc-9" first), or devel/omp/gcc-9 (put "omp" first)? I don't care too much, but have a slight preference for devel/omp/gcc-9 (it keeps the short-hand "og9" tag meaningful, and devel/omp/gcc-10, devel/omp/master, etc. group nicely), so suggest to use that going forward, unless there is a request to not introduce any further hierarchies (slash) in the devel/ namespace? Grüße Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |