gcc archive
date index for February, 2020

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

February 29, 2020
22:41 gcc-9-20200229 is now available gccadmin
20:19 Re: GCC 8.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Iain Sandoe
17:29 Question about Walking Compilation Tree in pass_manager.h Nicholas Krause
07:29 Re: [PATCH] Weird Linker Error Nicholas Krause

February 28, 2020
22:39 gcc-8-20200228 is now available gccadmin
17:32 SSA Operands Locking Nicholas Krause
16:44 Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic Paul Smith
16:38 Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic Martin Jambor
16:22 Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic Nathan Sidwell
13:50 Re: GCC 9.3 Status Report (2020-02-28) H.J. Lu
13:45 Effective and cheapest solution to prevent viro- and bacterial spreading Coronacover.com
13:41 GCC 9.3 Status Report (2020-02-28) Jakub Jelinek
13:09 Re: what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/ Jonathan Wakely
06:34 Re: what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/ maticulous
06:34 MLIR Dialects for Multi-Threading GCC Nicholas Krause
05:59 Re: what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/ Alfie blake
02:01 Re: GSoC: some questions about the static analyzer pass David Malcolm
01:32 GSoC: some questions about the static analyzer pass yilu at bupt dot edu dot cn

February 27, 2020
21:45 Re: Discussion on Removal of Garbage Collector and other GCC Multi threaded Work Nicholas Krause
20:31 Re: GCC 8.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org William Seurer
20:02 Re: Discussion on Removal of Garbage Collector and other GCC Multi threaded Work David Malcolm
19:07 Discussion on Removal of Garbage Collector and other GCC Multi threaded Work Nicholas Krause
18:33 Re: Help implementing support for vec<tree*> in gengtype Nicholas Krause
18:03 Re: [AArch64] Backporting -moutline-atomics to gcc 9.x and 8.x Kyrill Tkachov
17:56 Help implementing support for vec<tree*> in gengtype Giuliano Belinassi
17:04 Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic Paul Smith
16:58 Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic Jonathan Wakely
16:53 [AArch64] Backporting -moutline-atomics to gcc 9.x and 8.x Pop, Sebastian
16:18 Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic Nicholas Krause
13:38 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Nathan Sidwell
09:30 Re: what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/ Alfie blake
09:23 what is the post price of this sites?https://gcc.gnu.org/ Alfie blake
08:45 Re: Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic Jonathan Wakely
08:43 Re: Binaries page modifications Jonathan Wakely
08:24 Binaries page modifications CHIGOT, CLEMENT
06:50 Make LTO Patch for Job Server Thread Detection Agnostic Nicholas Krause

February 26, 2020
22:44 Mathematical Statistics Functions for libgo Arjunlal M.A
22:25 GCC 8.4 Status Report (2020-02-26) Jakub Jelinek
22:18 GCC 8.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jakub Jelinek
21:30 Re: issue with GDB python pretty-printers for libstdc++ Paul Smith
17:23 Re: issue with GDB python pretty-printers for libstdc++ Jonathan Wakely
17:02 Re: issue with GDB python pretty-printers for libstdc++ Jonathan Wakely
16:51 Re: GCC Bugzilla (and other) timeouts Jonathan Wakely
16:25 Re: GCC Bugzilla (and other) timeouts Martin Sebor
15:08 Re: GCC Bugzilla (and other) timeouts Frank Ch. Eigler
14:42 Re: GCC Bugzilla (and other) timeouts Jason Merrill
14:31 issue with GDB python pretty-printers for libstdc++ Paul Smith
08:32 Re: GCC Bugzilla (and other) timeouts Jonathan Wakely

February 25, 2020
22:13 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements Gabriel Dos Reis via gcc
22:11 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements David Malcolm
22:03 Typo in Tree SSA Passes Nicholas Krause
19:58 RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements Modi Mo via gcc
18:25 GCC Bugzilla (and other) timeouts Martin Sebor
17:26 Git branch name to use for development branch based on release branch, not master Thomas Schwinge
15:27 Notification: Document Received DocuSign
15:02 Important Mailbox Notice Mail Server
10:55 Re: libquadmath FX
09:47 Re: libquadmath FX

February 24, 2020
15:12 Re: Branch instructions that depend on target distance Jeff Law
13:00 Re: Hey, spotted an out-of-date reference on gcc.gnu.org Jonathan Wakely
12:32 Re: Branch instructions that depend on target distance Petr Tesarik
12:24 Re: Branch instructions that depend on target distance Julian Brown
12:24 Hey, spotted an out-of-date reference on gcc.gnu.org Richard @ Quality Nonsense PR
12:03 Re: Branch instructions that depend on target distance Alexander Monakov
11:51 Re: Branch instructions that depend on target distance Andreas Schwab
11:43 Re: Branch instructions that depend on target distance Andrew Stubbs
11:41 Re: Branch instructions that depend on target distance Petr Tesarik
11:36 Re: Branch instructions that depend on target distance Petr Tesarik
11:29 Re: Branch instructions that depend on target distance Andreas Schwab
11:14 Re: Branch instructions that depend on target distance Jozef Lawrynowicz
11:05 Branch instructions that depend on target distance Petr Tesarik

February 23, 2020
22:40 gcc-10-20200223 is now available gccadmin
20:44 Re: GCC 8.4 Status Report (2020-02-17) Jakub Jelinek
18:25 Re: GCC 8.4 Status Report (2020-02-17) Thomas Backlund
15:20 bounty available for porting AVR backend to MODE_CC Matt Wette
09:48 Re: Request for better syntax checking in lang.opt Thomas Koenig
00:22 Re: Matching and testing against smulhsm3 Segher Boessenkool

February 22, 2020
22:41 gcc-9-20200222 is now available gccadmin

February 21, 2020
22:39 gcc-8-20200221 is now available gccadmin
10:14 Re: ABI compatibility: GCC9 vs GCC10 Jonathan Wakely
09:43 Re: Request for better syntax checking in lang.opt Martin Liška
09:31 Re: GSoC Richard Biener
08:18 GSoC shivam tiwari
05:57 ABI compatibility: GCC9 vs GCC10 Jason Mancini

February 20, 2020
18:08 Re: Request for better syntax checking in lang.opt Thomas Koenig
13:23 Re: GCC 8.4 Status Report (2020-02-17) Bernd Edlinger
08:16 Re: Request for better syntax checking in lang.opt Martin Liška
07:29 Request for better syntax checking in lang.opt Thomas Koenig

February 19, 2020
11:34 Hey, spotted an out-of-date reference on gcc.gnu.org Richard @ Quality Nonsense PR
09:24 Re: GCC 8.4 Status Report (2020-02-17) Richard Biener

February 18, 2020
21:05 Re: Fwd: [llvm-dev] Open Source Hackathon Mentorship Invitation Nicholas Krause
19:37 Re: GCC 8.4 Status Report (2020-02-17) Bernd Edlinger
13:39 Re: update github gcc mirror forks to the new repo? Dennis Luehring
10:43 Re: update github gcc mirror forks to the new repo? Jonathan Wakely
06:38 update github gcc mirror forks to the new repo? Dennis Luehring

February 17, 2020
20:55 Re: Matching and testing against smulhsm3 Marcus Geelnard
16:06 Sua fatura chegou. 430189 gcbcustomerservice
13:49 libc coordination list Florian Weimer
10:45 GCC 8.4 Status Report (2020-02-17) Jakub Jelinek
09:58 Re: Is ther document that describes how the "braching/fixing" on releases is done Dennis Luehring
09:51 Re: Is ther document that describes how the "braching/fixing" on releases is done Richard Biener
01:12 Re: Matching and testing against smulhsm3 Segher Boessenkool

February 16, 2020
22:42 gcc-10-20200216 is now available gccadmin
20:52 Re: Matching and testing against smulhsm3 Marcus Geelnard
18:22 Re: Is ther document that describes how the "braching/fixing" on releases is done Dennis Luehring
17:42 Re: Is ther document that describes how the "braching/fixing" on releases is done David Edelsohn
17:36 Re: Is ther document that describes how the "braching/fixing" on releases is done Dennis Luehring
17:27 Re: Is ther document that describes how the "braching/fixing" on releases is done David Edelsohn
17:19 Re: Is ther document that describes how the "braching/fixing" on releases is done Dennis Luehring
17:03 Re: Is ther document that describes how the "braching/fixing" on releases is done David Edelsohn
16:35 Is ther document that describes how the "braching/fixing" on releases is done Dennis Luehring

February 15, 2020
22:40 gcc-9-20200215 is now available gccadmin
16:14 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements Jeff Law

February 14, 2020
23:10 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements Segher Boessenkool
22:39 gcc-8-20200214 is now available gccadmin
20:50 Re: GCC selftest improvements Mike Stump
14:55 C++11 bootstrap (was: GCC selftest improvements) Jason Merrill

February 13, 2020
22:18 RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements Modi Mo via gcc
12:35 Re: GCC GSoC 2020: Call for mentors and project ideas Martin Jambor
12:25 Hey, spotted an out-of-date reference on gcc.gnu.org Richard @ Quality Nonsense PR
02:42 Re: Do we need to do a loop invariant motion after loop interchange ? Li Jia He
02:28 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements Nicholas Krause
01:53 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements David Malcolm
00:49 RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC selftest improvements Modi Mo via gcc

February 12, 2020
23:10 Re: GCC GSoC 2020: Call for mentors and project ideas Joseph Myers
23:02 Re: GCC GSoC 2020: Call for mentors and project ideas JeanHeyd Meneide
22:55 Re: GCC GSoC 2020: Call for mentors and project ideas David Malcolm
19:20 Re: [VERY URGENT] GNU ideas for GSOC 2020 Jose E. Marchesi
18:59 [VERY URGENT] GNU ideas for GSOC 2020 Jose E. Marchesi
08:31 Re: missed PTA optimization? Richard Biener

February 11, 2020
21:27 Re: missed PTA optimization? Uecker, Martin
20:43 Re: missed PTA optimization? Richard Biener
20:32 missed PTA optimization? Uecker, Martin
14:11 Re: Eagerly evaluate __atomic_is_lock_free to 0 for oversized types Jonathan Wakely
11:04 Re: What's GNU -- and what's not Mark Wielaard
04:58 Re: Eagerly evaluate __atomic_is_lock_free to 0 for oversized types Andrew Pinski
04:40 Re: Eagerly evaluate __atomic_is_lock_free to 0 for oversized types Andrew Pinski
04:35 Eagerly evaluate __atomic_is_lock_free to 0 for oversized types Fangrui Song
00:37 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool

February 10, 2020
21:05 Request For Partnership CLI INVESTMENT GROUP
17:51 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Matthew Malcomson
17:27 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:09 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Richard Biener
11:21 The Property Investor Show 2020 Callie Smith
10:50 Chelsea Antiques Fair-2020 Jane Smith

February 09, 2020
22:40 gcc-10-20200209 is now available gccadmin
18:02 Re: Matching and testing against smulhsm3 Segher Boessenkool
17:49 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool
12:20 How should I check if a type can be contextually converted to another one in c++FE Bin.Cheng
11:15 Re: Matching and testing against smulhsm3 m
10:46 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Jonathan Wakely
10:08 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool
08:41 [rms at gnu dot org: What's GNU -- and what's not] Alfred M. Szmidt

February 08, 2020
23:55 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Andrew Pinski
22:40 gcc-9-20200208 is now available gccadmin
19:58 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool
16:50 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool

February 07, 2020
23:17 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Alan Modra
22:41 gcc-8-20200207 is now available gccadmin
22:34 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Tom Tromey
21:41 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Jason Merrill
18:37 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Tom Tromey
16:00 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool
15:44 Re: Matching and testing against smulhsm3 Segher Boessenkool
15:43 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Richard Earnshaw (lists)
15:33 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool
14:41 Matching and testing against smulhsm3 m
13:56 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Richard Earnshaw (lists)
13:48 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool
10:08 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Jonathan Wakely
09:20 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Richard Biener
01:58 Re: GCC GSoC 2020: Call for mentors and project ideas David Malcolm

February 06, 2020
23:10 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool
22:25 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool
20:33 Re: C++ constructors and callgraph interaction ("__ct_comp " vs constructor function body) David Malcolm
18:58 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Jason Merrill
18:19 Re: Missed optimization with endian and alignment independent memory access on x64 Alexander Monakov
17:36 Missed optimization with endian and alignment independent memory access on x64 Moritz Strübe
16:25 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Jakub Jelinek
16:18 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool
16:00 Re: C++ 20 Jonathan Wakely
15:50 C++ 20 Paul Deitel
14:56 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Jakub Jelinek
14:40 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Jonathan Wakely
14:01 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Richard Biener
13:51 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool
13:37 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool
13:01 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Jeff Law
12:49 Re: C++ constructors and callgraph interaction ("__ct_comp " vs constructor function body) Martin Jambor
08:51 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Richard Sandiford
04:35 Re: C++ constructors and callgraph interaction ("__ct_comp " vs constructor function body) David Malcolm
04:07 C++ constructors and callgraph interaction ("__ct_comp " vs constructor function body) David Malcolm

February 05, 2020
21:42 [committed] wwwdocs: New GCC mirror from Rabat, Morocco Gerald Pfeifer
21:18 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Segher Boessenkool
15:52 Re: GSoC Questions Nicholas Krause
15:34 Re: GSoC Questions Martin Liška
06:21 GSoC Questions Nicholas Krause
00:23 Re: Git question: Rebasing a user branch Richard Earnshaw

February 04, 2020
23:26 Re: Git question: Rebasing a user branch Bill Schmidt
23:20 Re: Git question: Rebasing a user branch Andreas Schwab
23:09 Re: Git question: Rebasing a user branch Andreas Schwab
22:41 Re: Git question: Rebasing a user branch Bill Schmidt
22:31 Re: Git question: Rebasing a user branch Andreas Schwab
22:18 Re: Git question: Rebasing a user branch Nicholas Krause
22:16 Re: Git question: Rebasing a user branch H.J. Lu
22:03 Git question: Rebasing a user branch Bill Schmidt
17:43 Fwd: February sourceware.org transition to new server! Jeff Law
16:28 Re: [PATCH] analyzer: fix build error with clang (PR 93543) Sebastian Huber
15:46 Re: [PATCH] analyzer: fix build error with clang (PR 93543) David Malcolm
15:26 Re: [PATCH] analyzer: fix build error with clang (PR 93543) Jakub Jelinek
14:01 [PATCH] analyzer: fix build error with clang (PR 93543) David Malcolm
13:58 Re: GCC build error on FreeBSD 12.1 with LLVM 8.0.1 Jakub Jelinek
13:53 GCC build error on FreeBSD 12.1 with LLVM 8.0.1 Sebastian Huber
10:41 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Andrew Stubbs

February 03, 2020
21:08 Re: Warning on move and dereference of unique_ptr in the same expression Allan Sandfeld Jensen
20:47 Re: Warning on move and dereference of unique_ptr in the same expression Marek Polacek
20:26 Warning on move and dereference of unique_ptr in the same expression Allan Sandfeld Jensen
20:24 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Jeff Law
19:48 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Segher Boessenkool
18:57 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Segher Boessenkool
18:55 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Richard Sandiford
18:20 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Michael Matz
18:09 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Michael Matz
18:06 Re: Aliasing rules for unannotated SYMBOL_REFs Richard Sandiford
18:03 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Joseph Myers
17:54 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Richard Earnshaw (lists)
17:54 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Jakub Jelinek
17:49 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Michael Matz
17:36 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Richard Earnshaw (lists)
17:34 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Segher Boessenkool
17:31 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Michael Matz
17:19 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Segher Boessenkool
17:17 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Segher Boessenkool
16:12 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Andrew Clayton
15:15 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Richard Earnshaw (lists)
15:13 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Richard Earnshaw (lists)
15:05 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Richard Earnshaw (lists)
14:13 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Jonathan Wakely
14:11 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Jason Merrill
14:00 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Richard Earnshaw (lists)
13:54 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Segher Boessenkool
13:01 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Nathan Sidwell
12:51 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Alexander Monakov
11:59 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Richard Earnshaw (lists)
11:54 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Alexander Monakov
11:41 Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions Richard Earnshaw (lists)
10:15 Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry Richard Earnshaw (lists)

February 02, 2020
22:41 gcc-10-20200202 is now available gccadmin
07:44 Feature request for "friendship" of pointers in "C" aotto

February 01, 2020
22:40 gcc-9-20200201 is now available gccadmin


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc