This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: fast_math_flags_set_p vs. set_fast_math_flags inconsistency?


Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> 
> > This has the effect that e.g. after
> > 
> >   -ffast-math -fno-finite-math-only
> > 
> > the __FAST_MATH__ macro is no longer predefined, but after
> > 
> >   -ffast-math -fno-associative-math
> > 
> > the __FAST_MATH__ macro still *is* predefined, even though both
> > -ffinite-math-only and -fassociative-math are implied by -ffast-math.
> > 
> > Is this deliberate?  (If so, is it documented somewhere?)
> 
> I'd expect both to cause it to be undefined.  My guess would be that some 
> past patch, after fast_math_flags_set_p was added, added more flags to 
> -ffast-math but accidentally failed to update fast_math_flags_set_p; you'd 
> need to look at past patches adding flags to -ffast-math to confirm if 
> it's accidental.

It looks like there's multiple cases here.  For the two flags
-fassociative-math and -freciprocal-math, it seems to have happened just as
you describe: they were created (split out of -funsafe-math-optimizations)
in commit a1a826110720eda37c73f829daa4ee243ee953f5, which however did not
update fast_math_flags_set_p.

For the other three flags, -fsignaling-nans, -frounding-math, and
-fcx-limited-range, the story appears to be a bit different: from the
very beginning, those were treated somewhat differently: these are
only modified as a result of -ffast-math, not -fno-fast-math (like
the other flags derived from -ffast-math), and they are not considered
by fast_math_flags_set_p.  (I'm not sure if there is any particular
reason why these should be treated differently here, though.)

Finally, there is one "mixed" flag, -fexcess-precision, which is handled
like the above three in that its default is only modified as a result of
-ffast-math, not -fno-fast-math; but nevertheless this flag *is* checked
in fast_math_flags_set_p.

Do you think there is something that ought to be fixed here?

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]