This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: makefile dependencies


Thanks, Joseph. This is exactly what I was looking for.
-Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org <gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of Joseph Myers
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 3:57 PM
To: Andrew Dean <Andrew.Dean@microsoft.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: makefile dependencies

On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Andrew Dean via gcc wrote:

> But I can see that aarch64-builtins.c also includes headers not listed 
> here. (function.h, basic-block.h, for example) Are we supposed to 
> manually keep track of the transitive header dependencies and keep the 
> makefiles up to date, or is there some sort of automatic dependency 
> management that is happening on our behalf? Something along the lines 
> of some of the answers provided here:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2394609/makefile-header-dependencies

The automatic dependency patch series
<https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg01662.html> did not generally address target-specific files (though it updated t-i386 as an example); see <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01218.html>
for more discussion of what it did not include.  It is quite possible that some places are specifying dependencies manually unnecessarily.

--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]