This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Call for volunteers: GCC Bugzilla account approval

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: R0b0t1 <r030t1 at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:13:47 +0100
Subject: Re: Call for volunteers: GCC Bugzilla account approval
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CAGWvnynwrdG5TLDe3pbVjyruEybRP6Kkp5VWXHZRXKT-6RXfmQ@mail.gmail.com> <8737av7wvh.fsf@redhat.com> <CAAD4mYjTKgef6AOhB_PnN40yfssZPLCs0H7sm8KOm9L6cq5kiA@mail.gmail.com>

On 21 June 2017 at 06:17, R0b0t1 wrote:
> P.S. David, not that I mind everyone knowing of my interest, but I
> didn't reply publicly. This list seems to expect people to not want to
> reply to the list by default, as hitting "reply" stuffs the responder
> into the TO field and the message doesn't get sent to the list. This
> was my intent in this case, so sorry if the message was confusing.

It just expects you to use "Reply all" if you want to reply to all, or
check where you're sending the email before hitting send. See
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Lots of lists work that way, but whether the list is configured for
reply-to-list or reply-to-sender, somebody is always surprised by it.

References:
- Call for volunteers: GCC Bugzilla account approval
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: Call for volunteers: GCC Bugzilla account approval
  - From: Frank Ch. Eigler
- Re: Call for volunteers: GCC Bugzilla account approval
  - From: R0b0t1

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]