This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
October 31, 2016
| 23:05 | Link Question | Peter Hill |
October 30, 2016
| 22:35 | gcc-7-20161030 is now available | gccadmin |
October 28, 2016
| 12:00 | [PATCH][0/2] GIMPLE Frontend | Richard Biener |
| 11:08 | Questions about pedantic_non_lvalue_loc and related code | Bin.Cheng |
| 08:17 | Re: libffi maintenance within GCC? | Andrew Haley |
| 03:03 | Re: libffi maintenance within GCC? | Ian Lance Taylor |
October 27, 2016
| 22:36 | gcc-6-20161027 is now available | gccadmin |
| 19:17 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Toon Moene |
| 13:59 | Re: libffi maintenance within GCC? | Andrew Haley |
| 13:16 | boehm-gc maintenance within GCC ? | Matthias Klose |
| 13:09 | Re: libffi maintenance within GCC? | Anthony Green |
| 12:56 | libffi maintenance within GCC? | Matthias Klose |
October 26, 2016
| 18:31 | Re: History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
| 18:24 | Re: History of GCC | Eric Gallager |
| 18:06 | Re: History of GCC | David Edelsohn |
| 18:04 | Re: History of GCC | Ed Smith-Rowland |
| 17:56 | Re: History of GCC | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 17:49 | Re: History of GCC | Ed Smith-Rowland |
| 17:35 | Re: History of GCC | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
| 17:33 | Re: History of GCC | Richard Kenner |
| 17:32 | Re: History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
| 17:28 | Re: History of GCC | Richard Kenner |
| 17:26 | Re: History of GCC | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 17:24 | Re: History of GCC | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 17:17 | Re: History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
| 17:16 | Re: History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
| 17:16 | Re: History of GCC | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 17:06 | Re: History of GCC | Jakub Jelinek |
| 16:57 | Re: History of GCC | Marek Polacek |
| 16:35 | Re: History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
| 16:31 | Re: History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
| 15:56 | Re: History of GCC | Jeff Law |
| 13:20 | Re: History of GCC | Joel Sherrill |
| 13:07 | Re: History of GCC | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 09:24 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Richard Biener |
| 05:53 | History of GCC | Will Hawkins |
October 25, 2016
| 22:36 | gcc-5-20161025 is now available | gccadmin |
| 19:42 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Toon Moene |
| 08:46 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Maxim Ostapenko |
| 08:37 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Jakub Jelinek |
| 08:32 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Maxim Ostapenko |
| 08:16 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Richard Biener |
October 24, 2016
| 21:25 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Eric Gallager |
| 20:21 | Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Toon Moene |
| 15:09 | Call for Participation: Valgrind at FOSDEM 2017 | Mark Wielaard |
October 23, 2016
| 22:35 | gcc-7-20161023 is now available | gccadmin |
| 18:58 | Re: where is the source code generate crtbegin.o (i386)? | Florian Weimer |
| 17:30 | where is the source code generate crtbegin.o (i386)? | zet |
October 22, 2016
| 14:34 | Re: Calling convention for "Routines for floating point emulation" | Yichao Yu |
| 02:44 | Website bị mất đi từ khóa gg... | Truong Tuan |
October 21, 2016
| 21:05 | Copyright assignment | Dimitar Dimitrov |
| 19:44 | Re: I see this maybe related to PR71375 ? | David Edelsohn |
| 19:41 | I see this maybe related to PR71375 ? | Jerry DeLisle |
| 16:07 | Re: glibc test tst-thread_local1.cc fails to compile with latest GCC | Steve Ellcey |
| 16:03 | Re: glibc test tst-thread_local1.cc fails to compile with latest GCC | Jonathan Wakely |
| 13:46 | GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21) | Jakub Jelinek |
| 10:03 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Florian Weimer |
| 08:39 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Florian Weimer |
October 20, 2016
| 22:36 | gcc-6-20161020 is now available | gccadmin |
| 22:08 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Eric Botcazou |
| 20:30 | Re: Reduced source set | Jonathan Wakely |
| 20:06 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Jim Wilson |
| 19:05 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Florian Weimer |
| 18:52 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Florian Weimer |
| 18:37 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Jeff Law |
| 17:17 | Re: LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Andreas Schwab |
| 16:28 | LSDA unwind information is off by one (in __gcc_personality_v0) | Florian Weimer |
| 15:14 | Reduced source set | Bernhard Schommer |
| 08:45 | Re: [BUILDROBOT] s390.md:10630:9: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] | Andreas Krebbel1 |
October 19, 2016
| 17:51 | Re: glibc test tst-thread_local1.cc fails to compile with latest GCC | Andrew Pinski |
| 17:45 | glibc test tst-thread_local1.cc fails to compile with latest GCC | Ellcey, Steve |
| 17:15 | Re: [BUILDROBOT] ICE in altivec_init_builtins, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17547 | David Edelsohn |
| 16:59 | [BUILDROBOT] ICE in altivec_init_builtins, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17547 | Jan-Benedict Glaw |
| 16:38 | Re: [BUILDROBOT] s390.md:10630:9: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] | Jeff Law |
| 16:26 | [BUILDROBOT] s390.md:10630:9: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] | Jan-Benedict Glaw |
| 10:58 | Re: [PR lto/77458] Avoid ICE in offloading with differing _FloatN, _FloatNx types | Thomas Schwinge |
| 10:29 | [PR tree-optimization/78024] Clear basic block flags before using BB_VISITED for OpenACC loops processing | Thomas Schwinge |
| 10:07 | Re: Clear basic block flags before using BB_VISITED for OpenACC loops processing | Richard Biener |
October 18, 2016
October 17, 2016
October 16, 2016
| 23:48 | Re: Question about sibling call epilogues & registers | Daniel Santos |
| 22:35 | gcc-7-20161016 is now available | gccadmin |
| 22:27 | Re: Question about sibling call epilogues & registers | Segher Boessenkool |
| 22:02 | Re: Question about sibling call epilogues & registers | Daniel Santos |
| 16:27 | [RFC] Reliable compiler specification setting (at least include/lib dirs) through the process environment | Shea Levy |
| 01:41 | Re: Question about sibling call epilogues & registers | Segher Boessenkool |
October 15, 2016
| 12:29 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
| 06:42 | Question about sibling call epilogues & registers | Daniel Santos |
October 14, 2016
| 15:36 | DWARF Version 5 Public Review Draft Released | Michael Eager |
| 11:07 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Richard Biener |
| 11:07 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Richard Biener |
| 11:00 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Nathan Sidwell |
| 10:57 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Bernd Schmidt |
| 09:28 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Richard Biener |
| 09:27 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Richard Biener |
| 09:15 | Re: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Bernd Schmidt |
| 08:02 | basic_block flags, BB_VISITED | Thomas Schwinge |
October 13, 2016
| 22:36 | gcc-6-20161013 is now available | gccadmin |
| 20:21 | Re: bootstrap possibly broken on trunk ? | Martin Sebor |
| 19:42 | Re: bootstrap possibly broken on trunk ? | Christophe Lyon |
| 18:31 | Re: bootstrap possibly broken on trunk ? | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
| 17:42 | bootstrap possibly broken on trunk ? | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
| 16:45 | small testcase gcc6 + boost optional + Wmaybe-uninit | Jason Mancini |
| 14:22 | Users of tm_p.h and emit-rtl.h now need to include memmodel.h | Thomas Preudhomme |
| 10:16 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Eric Botcazou |
| 08:50 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Richard Biener |
| 08:46 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Andre Vieira (lists) |
| 08:34 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Andre Vieira (lists) |
| 07:52 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Marc Glisse |
| 07:29 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
October 12, 2016
| 17:59 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Eric Botcazou |
| 16:50 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Jakub Jelinek |
| 16:45 | Re: Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Jakub Jelinek |
| 16:02 | Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Andre Vieira (lists) |
| 16:01 | Potential bug with wide_int_storage::set_len | Andre Vieira (lists) |
| 09:14 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Richard Biener |
| 09:07 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Marc Glisse |
| 07:48 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Richard Biener |
| 07:45 | Re: how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
| 07:39 | how to check if target supports andnot instruction ? | Prathamesh Kulkarni |
October 11, 2016
| 22:36 | gcc-5-20161011 is now available | gccadmin |
| 21:32 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Jeff Law |
| 18:48 | Bootstrap breakage in Fortran | Jerry DeLisle |
| 17:24 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Jason Merrill |
| 15:54 | RE: VREGS cannot handle subreg(mem (plus ...)) pattern | Claudiu Zissulescu |
| 15:06 | Re: VREGS cannot handle subreg(mem (plus ...)) pattern | Jeff Law |
| 14:58 | Re: VREGS cannot handle subreg(mem (plus ...)) pattern | Claudiu Zissulescu |
| 14:54 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Martin Sebor |
| 14:49 | VREGS cannot handle subreg(mem (plus ...)) pattern | Claudiu Zissulescu |
| 01:59 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Eric S. Raymond |
October 10, 2016
| 22:16 | Re: Converting to LRA (calling all maintainers) | Eric Botcazou |
| 21:53 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Joseph Myers |
| 20:08 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Eric S. Raymond |
| 17:47 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Joseph Myers |
| 15:43 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Jason Merrill |
| 10:38 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Jonathan Wakely |
| 09:38 | Re: error printing in reversed order ? | Jonathan Wakely |
October 09, 2016
| 22:35 | gcc-7-20161009 is now available | gccadmin |
October 07, 2016
October 06, 2016
| 22:37 | gcc-6-20161006 is now available | gccadmin |
| 21:59 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Frank Ch. Eigler |
| 20:31 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Joseph Myers |
| 19:41 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Jason Merrill |
| 17:19 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Eric S. Raymond |
| 16:10 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Joseph Myers |
| 16:01 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Eric S. Raymond |
| 15:43 | Re: Repository for the conversion machinery | Joseph Myers |
| 12:45 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | David Brown |
October 05, 2016
| 22:59 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Pedro Alves |
| 22:56 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Pedro Alves |
| 20:24 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Florian Weimer |
| 20:19 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Florian Weimer |
| 16:23 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Jason Merrill |
| 16:18 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Paul.Koning |
| 16:12 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Jeff Law |
| 06:59 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | David Brown |
| 00:08 | Re: style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Martin Sebor |
October 04, 2016
October 03, 2016
| 23:49 | style convention: /*foo_p=*/ to annotate bool arguments | Martin Sebor |
| 14:09 | Re: [PATCH MIPS] Work around Bash 4.2 bug | Ludovic Courtès |
| 09:50 | Re: [PATCH MIPS] Work around Bash 4.2 bug | Maciej W. Rozycki |
| 02:31 | Re: doc maintainer questions | David Wohlferd |
October 02, 2016
| 22:36 | gcc-7-20161002 is now available | gccadmin |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]