This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>, "Zamyatin, Igor" <igor dot zamyatin at intel dot com>, "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 13:39:44 -0700
Subject: Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <87r3z33g2q dot fsf at kepler dot schwinge dot homeip dot net> <54205555 dot 5040506 at redhat dot com> <0EFAB2BDD0F67E4FB6CCC8B9F87D756969B792F6 at IRSMSX101 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com> <871tqug0ft dot fsf at kepler dot schwinge dot homeip dot net> <20140929110019 dot GC17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <CAMe9rOpaNrtjv2N=dKALK7Cod8BOhQxJ4xbxdtxQDbuk14iOyA at mail dot gmail dot com>

On 02/23/15 14:41, H.J. Lu wrote:

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:

Hi!

On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:30 +0000, "Zamyatin, Igor" <igor.zamyatin@intel.com> wrote:

Jeff Law wrote:

The original plan was for Balaji to take on this role; however, his assignment
within Intel has changed and thus he's not going to have time to work on
Cilk+ anymore.

Igor Zamyatin has been doing a fair amount of Cilk+ maintenance/bugfixing
and it might make sense for him to own it in the long term if he's interested.


That's right.


Thanks!

Can I add 2 records (cilk plus and libcilkrts) to Various Maintainers section?


I understand Jeff's email as a pre-approval of such a patch.


I think only SC can appoint maintainers, and while Jeff is in the SC,
my reading of that mail wasn't that it was the SC that has acked that, but
rather a question if Igor is willing to take that role, which then would
need to be acked by SC.


Where are we on this?  Do we have a maintainer for Cilk Plus
and its run-time library?

Not at this time. There was a bit of blockage on various things withthe steering committee (who approves maintainers). I've got ahalf-dozen or so proposals queued (including Cilk maintainership).


Jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?
  - From: Thomas Schwinge

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]