This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?

From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Zamyatin, Igor" <igor dot zamyatin at intel dot com>, "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <barry dot m dot tannenbaum at intel dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, "Jakub Jelinek" <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 18:41:37 -0600
Subject: Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <87r3z33g2q dot fsf at kepler dot schwinge dot homeip dot net> <54205555 dot 5040506 at redhat dot com> <0EFAB2BDD0F67E4FB6CCC8B9F87D756969B792F6 at IRSMSX101 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com> <871tqug0ft dot fsf at kepler dot schwinge dot homeip dot net> <20140929110019 dot GC17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <CAMe9rOpaNrtjv2N=dKALK7Cod8BOhQxJ4xbxdtxQDbuk14iOyA at mail dot gmail dot com> <54F8BF10 dot 2070701 at redhat dot com>

Hi!

On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 13:39:44 -0700, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 02/23/15 14:41, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:30 +0000, "Zamyatin, Igor" <igor.zamyatin@intel.com> wrote:
> >>>> Jeff Law wrote:
> >>>>> The original plan was for Balaji to take on this role; however, his assignment
> >>>>> within Intel has changed and thus he's not going to have time to work on
> >>>>> Cilk+ anymore.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Igor Zamyatin has been doing a fair amount of Cilk+ maintenance/bugfixing
> >>>>> and it might make sense for him to own it in the long term if he's interested.
> >>>>
> >>>> That's right.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>>> Can I add 2 records (cilk plus and libcilkrts) to Various Maintainers section?
> >>>
> >>> I understand Jeff's email as a pre-approval of such a patch.
> >>
> >> I think only SC can appoint maintainers, and while Jeff is in the SC,
> >> my reading of that mail wasn't that it was the SC that has acked that, but
> >> rather a question if Igor is willing to take that role, which then would
> >> need to be acked by SC.
> >
> > Where are we on this?  Do we have a maintainer for Cilk Plus
> > and its run-time library?
> Not at this time.  There was a bit of blockage on various things with 
> the steering committee (who approves maintainers).  I've got a 
> half-dozen or so proposals queued (including Cilk maintainership).

What's the process then, that I get my Cilk Plus (libcilkrts) portability
patches committed to GCC?  I was advisd this must be routed through Intel
(Barry M Tannenbaum CCed), which I have done months ago: I submitted the
patches to Intel, and -- as I understood it -- Barry and I seemed to
agree about them (at least I don't remember any requests for changes to
be made on my side), but I have not seen a merge from Intel to update
GCC's libcilkrts.  Should I now commit to GCC the pending patches,
<http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3C8738bae1mp.fsf%40kepler.schwinge.homeip.net%3E>
and following?


GrÃÃe,
 Thomas

Attachment: pgpeN2hxOs49t.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?
  - From: Tannenbaum, Barry M
- Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?
  - From: Jeff Law

References:
- Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?
  - From: Jeff Law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]