This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Inconsistency between code and docs

From: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: Paulo Matos <pmatos at broadcom dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:29:28 +0200
Subject: Re: Inconsistency between code and docs
References: <19EB96622A777C4AB91610E763265F4618195C@SJEXCHMB14.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <CAKOQZ8yEuTqKPGG+6V4+_ept1o5Whg4QiArGU7RG_8QurBH8YQ@mail.gmail.com> <19EB96622A777C4AB91610E763265F46187B81@SJEXCHMB14.corp.ad.broadcom.com>

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Paulo Matos <pmatos@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think the bug is in the documentation, and that
>> TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION should accept an IDENTIFIER_NODE.
>>
>> Ian
>
> I will be reporting this with bugzilla then.

Can you instead produce a patch?

> Thanks for the clarification,
>
> Paulo Matos
>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Inconsistency between code and docs
  - From: Paulo Matos
- RE: Inconsistency between code and docs
  - From: Paulo Matos

References:
- Inconsistency between code and docs
  - From: Paulo Matos
- Re: Inconsistency between code and docs
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- RE: Inconsistency between code and docs
  - From: Paulo Matos

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]