This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: Inconsistency between code and docs

From: "Paulo Matos" <pmatos at broadcom dot com>
To: "Richard Biener" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:26:35 +0000
Subject: RE: Inconsistency between code and docs
References: <19EB96622A777C4AB91610E763265F4618195C@SJEXCHMB14.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <CAKOQZ8yEuTqKPGG+6V4+_ept1o5Whg4QiArGU7RG_8QurBH8YQ@mail.gmail.com> <19EB96622A777C4AB91610E763265F46187B81@SJEXCHMB14.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <CAFiYyc0v3a0Oy7EOBcQxtn+h+HdxAobOMmA=iw-SkdEG9E9Gtw@mail.gmail.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guenther@gmail.com]
> Sent: 19 October 2012 09:29
> To: Paulo Matos
> Cc: Ian Lance Taylor; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Inconsistency between code and docs
> 
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Paulo Matos <pmatos@broadcom.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think the bug is in the documentation, and that
> >> TARGET_ASM_NAMED_SECTION should accept an IDENTIFIER_NODE.
> >>
> >> Ian
> >
> > I will be reporting this with bugzilla then.
> 
> Can you instead produce a patch?
> 

Sure.

References:
- Inconsistency between code and docs
  - From: Paulo Matos
- Re: Inconsistency between code and docs
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- RE: Inconsistency between code and docs
  - From: Paulo Matos
- Re: Inconsistency between code and docs
  - From: Richard Biener

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]