This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: target_header_dir vs host-x-host

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:02:12 -0700
Subject: Re: target_header_dir vs host-x-host
References: <201203160412.q2G4C6DV025456@greed.delorie.com> <mcrr4wtw4rt.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com> <201203160431.q2G4V6ZC025872@greed.delorie.com> <mcrmx7hw3tf.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com> <201203160450.q2G4oZGg026253@greed.delorie.com>

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:50 PM, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, but what's wrong --with-sysroot=/ ?
>
> It should work, it just seems "wrong" for a native compiler to have a sysroot...

I noticed that a lot of binutils tests fail if it is not compiled with
--with-sysroot=/ .  This is why I always compile my native/candian
cross toolchains with --with-sysroot=/ .

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- target_header_dir vs host-x-host
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: target_header_dir vs host-x-host
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: target_header_dir vs host-x-host
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: target_header_dir vs host-x-host
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: target_header_dir vs host-x-host
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]