This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Dependent Labels Question

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>
Cc: "'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:51:19 -0700
Subject: Re: Dependent Labels Question
References: <2950715866004049A240A2F9BB410E7315FB736697@azsmsx502.amr.corp.intel.com>

On 11/03/2011 12:54 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> Is it possible to make sure that the "LABELX" occurs right after the "Call some_function" instruction (and the instruction scheduler moves the label with the call INSN)? I insert the label right after the call is expanded and LABELX is being moved above the Call instruction by the schedule_insns function.

No.


r~

References:
- Dependent Labels Question
  - From: Iyer, Balaji V

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]