This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Dependent Labels Question

From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
To: "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>
Cc: "'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:37:52 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Dependent Labels Question
References: <2950715866004049A240A2F9BB410E7315FB736697@azsmsx502.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> Is it possible to make sure that the "LABELX" occurs right
> after the "Call some_function" instruction (and the instruction
> scheduler moves the label with the call INSN)? I insert the
> label right after the call is expanded and LABELX is being moved
> above the Call instruction by the schedule_insns function.

Is emitting the label in port-specific code together with the
call insn (trigged by a punctuation like "%&" for i386) not an
option?

brgds, H-P

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dependent Labels Question
  - From: Bernd Schmidt

References:
- Dependent Labels Question
  - From: Iyer, Balaji V

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]