This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22)
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Dongsheng Song <dongsheng dot song at gmail dot com>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:22:36 -0800
- Subject: Re: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22)
- References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1005222256320.1429@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <alpine.LSU.1.99.1005232108210.26362@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <AANLkTikwR2VZuowxH4ijoHghs2qIdaTiehYzu9UF2_R1@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=N-x87fDAD3uzR6Ady--k7Gtj48TgxwukRBA45@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin2nEeweUu+sLxvu9qDRVCOY-1F4c8P2ra1FEkn@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Dongsheng Song
> <dongsheng.song@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:44, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It would be nice if the scripts could check whether only DATESTAMP
>>> changes were done since the last snapshot ...
>>
>> Just for curiousness, why we bump the DATESTAMP when the last commit is
>> DATESTAMP changes on the branch ?
>
> I wonder why we keep DATESTAMP at all now that we have a global
> source revision number (remember, CVS did not have that).
>
You get revision number only with contrib/gcc_update and not
everyone uses it. See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/
I primarily use GIT mirror which doesn't use subversion number.
--
H.J.