This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22)
- From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Dongsheng Song <dongsheng dot song at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:13:07 +0100
- Subject: Re: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22)
- References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1005222256320.1429@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <alpine.LSU.1.99.1005232108210.26362@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <AANLkTikwR2VZuowxH4ijoHghs2qIdaTiehYzu9UF2_R1@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=N-x87fDAD3uzR6Ady--k7Gtj48TgxwukRBA45@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Dongsheng Song
<dongsheng.song@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:44, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> It would be nice if the scripts could check whether only DATESTAMP
>> changes were done since the last snapshot ...
>
> Just for curiousness, why we bump the DATESTAMP when the last commit is
> DATESTAMP changes on the branch ?
I wonder why we keep DATESTAMP at all now that we have a global
source revision number (remember, CVS did not have that).
Richard.