This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO?

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: basile at starynkevitch dot net
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:45:20 +0100
Subject: Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO?
References: <1277765053.29547.60.camel@glinka> <mcriq5290bh.fsf@google.com> <1277789773.29547.76.camel@glinka> <mcr8w5yxsdo.fsf@google.com> <1277794931.29547.105.camel@glinka> <mcrzkyevsx0.fsf@google.com> <1277829355.29547.113.camel@glinka> <AANLkTiln-0l5BsScUHAWJZnDLjcThnPtY4lVAV8cQy1n@mail.gmail.com> <1277831492.29547.139.camel@glinka>

On 29 June 2010 18:11, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 12:50 -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
>>
>> Why don't we cross that bridge when we get to it?
>
> [I am not sure to understand the above sentence. What is the bridge?
> What is crossing it? Remember that I am not a native English speaker]

http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22cross+that+bridge%22

References:
- role of executable_checksum & LTO?
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO?
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO?
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO?
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch
- Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO?
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]