This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: role of executable_checksum & LTO?
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:35, Basile Starynkevitch
<basile@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
> I agree, but a plugin could also do likewise, e.g. write memory contents
> in some kind of persistent storage.
Why don't we cross that bridge when we get to it? It seems odd to me
that a plugin would want to wind itself very tightly around a specific
lto1 binary. I am not seeing an advantage to that kind of
requirement.
In fact, I'd love to have a PCH implementation that does not need to
tie itself to a specific binary.
Diego.