This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings
- From: "Vakatov, Denis (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [E]" <vakatov at ncbi dot nlm dot nih dot gov>
- To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, "Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]" <lavr at ncbi dot nlm dot nih dot gov>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:04:38 -0400
- Subject: RE: Request for suppressing "warn_unused_result" warnings
- References: <A9D8BF3D8A74DF4A925FB541C0F39D2A01FD02135D@NIHMLBX15.nih.gov> <4BFFC134.8050900@gnu.org> <A9D8BF3D8A74DF4A925FB541C0F39D2A01FD021408@NIHMLBX15.nih.gov> <mcrhblrswq9.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <4C0058FB.3010003@gmail.com> <mcrhblrpnsk.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <4C006AD7.2020307@gmail.com> <AANLkTikhN3SrevqjorZE_EuZIpubZhDWKYIpr_kdtDyJ@mail.gmail.com> <4C010060.303@gmail.com>
Okay, I guess we 'll just disable the __wur's by default then -- as introducing an unnecessary hard-to-avoid noise. I recon many other people do the same.
Thanks nevertheless. It's still a useful feature, just not flexible enough to use it for *everyday* compilation.
Denis