This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++: variable length arrays and operator new
* Gabriel Dos Reis:
>>> Is this intentional? ?The equivalent "new char[a][b]" is rejected (as
>>> required by the C++ standard).
>> Is there any reason that g++ should reject your sample program?
> Yes: there is no obvious reason for gratuitous incompatibility in
That, and it requires full saturating multiplication support at
run-time if we want to fix PR19351 in the most straightforward way (by
passing size_t(-1) to the underlying allocator function in case of