This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Anyone for slush?

From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:31:37 -0500
Subject: Re: Anyone for slush?
References: <4AB4A9A8.7060805@gmail.com> <200909191658.56621.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <1253374142.3664.429.camel@localhost> <200909191813.20609.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

Eric Botcazou wrote:

Joel reported results for 4.5.0 20090910 r151592 and state of GCC changed a lot in the past 9 days. RTEMS is also a sjlj target IIRC.
Then, if EH is totally broken, a PR should be opened with a reduced testcase.

I will rebuild with the head and run ACATS on
one of the broken ones.  If still bad, then
I will try with some simple exception tests
Laurent put together the last time it broke.
Maybe they are useful again. :)

--joel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anyone for slush?
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Anyone for slush?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Anyone for slush?
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Anyone for slush?
  - From: Laurent GUERBY
- Re: Anyone for slush?
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]