This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Anyone for slush?

From: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:29:02 +0200
Subject: Re: Anyone for slush?
References: <4AB4A9A8.7060805@gmail.com> <4AB4E14D.8080808@gmail.com> <4AB4EA34.7000807@oarcorp.com> <200909191658.56621.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 16:58 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > I need to get run baseline test results on 4.3 and 4.4 for C and
> > C++.  But the GNAT/RTEMS Ada results show a large number of
> > failures on the head that were not present in 4.3 and 4.4.
> >
> > SPARC and MIPS went from 2 to 319
> > x86 went from about 20 (mostly qemu issues) to 225
> 
> OK, but the number of Ada failures is exactly 0 on x86/Linux, x86-64/Linux, 
> ia64/Linux, SPARC/Solaris and SPARC64/Solaris and 1 on PowerPC64/Linux so 
> you'll have to find out why it's so different for RTEMS.

Joel reported results for 4.5.0 20090910 r151592 and state of GCC
changed a lot in the past 9 days. RTEMS is also a sjlj target IIRC.

Sincerely,

Laurent

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anyone for slush?
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Anyone for slush?
  - From: Joel Sherrill

References:
- Anyone for slush?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Anyone for slush?
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Anyone for slush?
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: Anyone for slush?
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]