This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: putc vs. fputc

From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
To: Martin Guy <martinwguy at gmail dot com>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:41:04 +0200
Subject: Re: putc vs. fputc
References: <5787cf470907240137r3aefeeebsc9478c510d97ce85@mail.gmail.com> <56d259a00907240506v74d9abf2me9aa8a1b23f606aa@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/24/2009 02:06 PM, Martin Guy wrote:

The source of gcc uses both, fputc and putc. I would like to do some janitorial work and change fputc to putc.
putc and fputc have different semantics: fputc is guaranteed to be a function while putc may be a macro.

True, but does this fact matter in our case?

Uros.

References:
- putc vs. fputc
  - From: Uros Bizjak
- Re: putc vs. fputc
  - From: Martin Guy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]