gcc archive
author index for July, 2009

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

Manuel López-Ibáñez

• 2009-07-20 16:13 Re: Pre and post increment
• 2009-07-20 23:23 Re: Running a Single GCC Test Case
• 2009-07-23 21:03 Re: We shouldn't tell people to send e-mail to gcc-bugs
• 2009-07-23 21:10 Re: We shouldn't tell people to send e-mail to gcc-bugs
• 2009-07-27 10:28 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-27 12:19 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-27 17:46 removing -Wtraditional-conversion

Microsoft®

• 2009-07-13 04:44 Information Assistance

ÐÐÐÑÑÐÐ ÐÑÑÑÐÐÐÐ

• 2009-07-31 07:54 [gimple] ICE "verify_gimple error"
• 2009-07-31 20:06 Re: [gimple] ICE "verify_gimple error"

ZoltÃn KÃcsi

• 2009-07-18 12:31 Re: array semantic query
• 2009-07-30 12:51 ARM conditional instruction optimisation bug (feature?)

ami_stuff

• 2009-07-29 11:41 m68k - GCC 4.4.0 generates not so good code from asm inline
• 2009-07-29 16:57 Re: m68k - GCC 4.4.0 generates not so good code from asm inline

Adam Butcher

• 2009-07-29 10:27 Re: [lambda] Segmentation fault in simple lambda program

Adam Nemet

• 2009-07-15 16:35 Re: Code optimization with GCSE
• 2009-07-16 07:04 Re: Code optimization with GCSE

Adel Abushaev

• 2009-07-24 03:34 Re: GPL (probably a FAQ)

Alexandre Oliva

• 2009-07-01 05:26 Re: VTA merge?
• 2009-07-24 07:02 Re: GPL (probably a FAQ)
• 2009-07-24 23:19 merging VTA: what does it take?

Alfred M. Szmidt

• 2009-07-16 13:54 Re: Problem with static linking
• 2009-07-27 09:41 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-27 11:05 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4

Amitabha Roy

• 2009-07-01 21:56 gcc and x86 condition codes

anandulle

• 2009-07-24 16:56 gimple pass
• 2009-07-25 08:47 gcc-help needed

Andreas Schäfer

• 2009-07-09 14:19 Strange Performance Hit on 2D-Loop
• 2009-07-09 14:48 Re: Strange Performance Hit on 2D-Loop

Andreas Schwab

• 2009-07-05 08:21 Re: gtyp-input.list should contain absolute paths.
• 2009-07-05 08:30 Re: -print-* command-line switches misbehave or are misdocumented
• 2009-07-05 08:40 Re: gtyp-input.list should contain absolute paths.
• 2009-07-05 11:19 Re: gtyp-input.list should contain absolute paths.
• 2009-07-20 18:09 Re: Pre and post increment

Andrew Haley

• 2009-07-01 09:56 Re: howto configure so that CFLAGS='-g3 -O0' in gcc/Makefile?
• 2009-07-02 09:40 Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-02 14:22 Re: Aliasing bug
• 2009-07-16 07:41 Re: Problem with static linking
• 2009-07-17 09:00 Re: Problem with static linking
• 2009-07-18 19:09 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-19 15:23 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-20 11:41 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Gimplify unit-at-a-time (again)
• 2009-07-20 11:48 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Gimplify unit-at-a-time (again)
• 2009-07-20 18:37 Re: Pre and post increment

Andrew Pinski

• 2009-07-02 09:41 Re: Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-02 09:42 Re: Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-02 15:33 Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-18 19:19 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-18 19:29 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-20 15:33 Re: Pre and post increment
• 2009-07-20 15:52 Re: Pre and post increment
• 2009-07-23 17:16 Re: We shouldn't tell people to send e-mail to gcc-bugs
• 2009-07-23 21:07 Re: We shouldn't tell people to send e-mail to gcc-bugs
• 2009-07-23 21:11 Re: We shouldn't tell people to send e-mail to gcc-bugs

Andrew Stubbs

• 2009-07-02 13:21 Aliasing bug
• 2009-07-02 13:29 Re: Aliasing bug
• 2009-07-02 13:46 Re: Aliasing bug
• 2009-07-09 11:54 [SH] ICE compiling pr34330 testcase for sh-linux-gnu
• 2009-07-30 08:27 Re: [SH] ICE compiling pr34330 testcase for sh-linux-gnu

Angelo Graziosi

• 2009-07-24 08:40 Building GCC
• 2009-07-24 10:22 Failure in a complete build of current snapshot
• 2009-07-24 16:53 Re: Building GCC
• 2009-07-25 21:50 Re: Failure in a complete build of current gcc snapshot
• 2009-07-26 07:59 Re: Failure in a complete build of current gcc snapshot
• 2009-07-26 08:23 Re: Failure in a complete build of current gcc snapshot
• 2009-07-27 23:20 Re: Failure in a complete build of current gcc snapshot
• 2009-07-29 16:24 Re: GCC 4.3.4 release candidate available

ariga masahiro

• 2009-07-28 08:41 Cannot configure gcc4.4.0 in order to build h8300 crosscompiler
• 2009-07-30 00:49 Re: Cannot configure gcc4.4.0 in order to build h8300 crosscompiler
• 2009-07-30 05:34 Please help to build h8300 toolchain
• 2009-07-30 06:51 Re: Cannot configure gcc4.4.0 in order to build h8300 crosscompiler
• 2009-07-30 07:11 Re: Cannot configure gcc4.4.0 in order to build h8300 crosscompiler
• 2009-07-30 08:02 Re: Cannot configure gcc4.4.0 in order to build h8300 crosscompiler

Arnaud Charlet

• 2009-07-25 15:35 Re: Any ada maintainers out there this afternoon? (Ada bootstrap broken on newlib targets)
• 2009-07-26 09:38 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-26 09:56 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4

Art Haas

• 2009-07-30 14:38 Build failure in libgfortran on i386-pc-solaris2.10

Basile STARYNKEVITCH

• 2009-07-03 10:10 gtyp-input.list should contain absolute paths.
• 2009-07-03 13:51 Re: gtyp-input.list should contain absolute paths.
• 2009-07-05 06:27 Re: gtyp-input.list should contain absolute paths.
• 2009-07-05 08:33 Re: gtyp-input.list should contain absolute paths.
• 2009-07-05 09:23 Re: gtyp-input.list should contain absolute paths.
• 2009-07-06 15:01 preprocessors & GCC plugins
• 2009-07-08 19:28 gengtype in plugin mode should be enhanced
• 2009-07-09 08:49 libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
• 2009-07-09 11:58 Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
• 2009-07-09 12:38 Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
• 2009-07-09 13:01 Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
• 2009-07-09 13:46 Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
• 2009-07-09 14:06 Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
• 2009-07-09 15:20 Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
• 2009-07-09 16:49 plugins & PCH
• 2009-07-15 21:16 Re: [plugin] Directory for plugins distributed with gcc
• 2009-07-23 20:49 libstdc++.so.6.0.*-gdb.py might be installed at the wrong place
• 2009-07-24 14:56 Re: libstdc++.so.6.0.*-gdb.py might be installed at the wrong place
• 2009-07-28 16:22 Re: The future of concepts
• 2009-07-29 15:52 MELT tutorial on the wiki
• 2009-07-30 14:44 Re: need help on GCC driver
• 2009-07-31 05:19 Re: need help on GCC driver
• 2009-07-31 06:27 Re: MELT tutorial on the wiki

Ben Elliston

• 2009-07-24 04:53 Re: GPL (probably a FAQ)
• 2009-07-30 10:38 Re: [testsuite] Executing testcases under wine
• 2009-07-31 00:10 Re: Porting GCC 4.4.0 to interix
• 2009-07-31 05:27 Re: Difference between Windows and Linux GCC compiler

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2009-07-14 19:18 updating autotools status

Bernd Roesch

• 2009-07-29 17:12 Re: m68k - GCC 4.4.0 generates not so good code from asm inline

Bingfeng Mei

• 2009-07-07 09:22 Can GCC scheduler take advantage of mutually exclusive predicated blocks?
• 2009-07-21 11:41 libtool error in building GCC
• 2009-07-21 13:54 RE: libtool error in building GCC

BLUNA . tv

• 2009-07-15 07:21 Motion+3D. Argentina

Bradley Lucier

• 2009-07-15 20:38 Bootstrap failure configuring in-tree gmp in mainline
• 2009-07-25 16:47 Re: Bootstrap failure configuring in-tree gmp in mainline
• 2009-07-25 18:16 Re: Bootstrap failure configuring in-tree gmp in mainline
• 2009-07-25 18:18 Re: Bootstrap failure configuring in-tree gmp in mainline

Brian O'Mahoney

• 2009-07-06 21:30 Re: -print-* command-line switches misbehave or are misdocumented

Bryan James

• 2009-07-18 21:29 Order To New Zealand

Chris Lattner

• 2009-07-22 16:26 Re: Incorporation of Objective-C 2.0 changes into GCC trunk

contato

• 2009-07-24 22:12 Produtos Distribuidos OnlyQuality
• 2009-07-24 22:12 Produtos Distribuidos OnlyQuality

Daniel Berlin

• 2009-07-07 13:28 Re: Internal Representation
• 2009-07-16 15:45 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p

Daniel Franke

• 2009-07-02 10:01 -f[no-]finite-math-only

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2009-07-09 02:53 Re: avoiding gdb cc1plus PACK_EXPANSION_PATTERN(result) gives 'No symbol "__extension__"', error msg
• 2009-07-09 12:50 Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
• 2009-07-09 13:43 Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
• 2009-07-09 13:59 Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.

daniel.tian

• 2009-07-01 03:02 RE: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
• 2009-07-02 03:06 RE: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
• 2009-07-09 09:04 how to optimize address offset assignment

Danny Backx

• 2009-07-23 08:22 gcc 4.4.0 on ARM/WinCE float problem
• 2009-07-23 10:24 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on ARM/WinCE float problem
• 2009-07-23 12:55 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on ARM/WinCE float problem
• 2009-07-23 13:06 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on ARM/WinCE float problem
• 2009-07-24 12:51 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on ARM/WinCE float problem
• 2009-07-24 13:40 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on ARM/WinCE float problem
• 2009-07-24 13:52 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on ARM/WinCE float problem
• 2009-07-25 05:32 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on ARM/WinCE float problem

Dave Korn

• 2009-07-01 06:48 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
• 2009-07-04 23:21 Re: -print-* command-line switches misbehave or are misdocumented
• 2009-07-05 11:42 Re: -print-* command-line switches misbehave or are misdocumented
• 2009-07-07 11:54 Re: gcc-trunk bootstrap failure in libjava on i686-pc-cygwin
• 2009-07-09 11:41 Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
• 2009-07-09 12:17 Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
• 2009-07-13 00:40 Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20000804-1.c -O0 with PIC on gcc-4_4-branch
• 2009-07-13 08:18 Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20000804-1.c -O0 with PIC on gcc-4_4-branch
• 2009-07-18 11:48 Re: Output sections
• 2009-07-18 13:53 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-18 17:09 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-18 18:15 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-18 18:27 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-18 19:23 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-19 13:16 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-19 13:45 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-19 14:39 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-19 17:07 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-19 17:17 Can I have some basic BZ perms please?
• 2009-07-19 17:52 Re: Can I have some basic BZ perms please?
• 2009-07-22 11:06 Re: Incorporation of Objective-C 2.0 changes into GCC trunk
• 2009-07-23 08:54 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on ARM/WinCE float problem
• 2009-07-23 10:39 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on ARM/WinCE float problem
• 2009-07-24 01:15 Re: We shouldn't tell people to send e-mail to gcc-bugs
• 2009-07-24 11:32 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-24 11:46 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-24 12:02 Re: [patch libjava]: Add missing file for Win32
• 2009-07-25 14:14 Re: gcc-help needed
• 2009-07-25 15:18 Any ada maintainers out there this afternoon? (Ada bootstrap broken on newlib targets)
• 2009-07-25 15:31 Re: Any ada maintainers out there this afternoon? (Ada bootstrap broken on newlib targets)
• 2009-07-25 16:08 Re: Any ada maintainers out there this afternoon? (Ada bootstrap broken on newlib targets)
• 2009-07-26 00:13 Re: Failure in a complete build of current gcc snapshot
• 2009-07-27 10:38 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-29 09:24 Re: GCC 4.3.4 release candidate available

David Edelsohn

• 2009-07-03 11:37 Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-28 16:15 Re: How to figure out the gcc -dP output?

David Ronis

• 2009-07-23 16:18 Bootstrap failure in 4.4.1

Debarshi Sanyal

• 2009-07-23 06:27 #pragma startup doesn't work on GCC

dharmendra pandit

• 2009-07-18 09:35 Re: array semantic query
• 2009-07-18 09:38 array semantic query
• 2009-07-18 12:18 Re: array semantic query
• 2009-07-20 17:13 Re: Pre and post increment

Diego Novillo

• 2009-07-07 13:10 Status of LTO merge to mainline
• 2009-07-07 13:36 Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline
• 2009-07-08 12:12 Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline
• 2009-07-13 10:51 Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline
• 2009-07-14 18:09 [lto] Mainline merge at rev 149625
• 2009-07-15 18:43 Re: [plugin] Directory for plugins distributed with gcc
• 2009-07-15 19:14 Re: [plugin] Directory for plugins distributed with gcc
• 2009-07-24 13:07 [lto]: mainline merge @149863
• 2009-07-24 13:51 Re: [lto]: mainline merge @149863

DJ Delorie

• 2009-07-02 21:31 -frename-registers bug?
• 2009-07-02 21:43 Re: -frename-registers bug?
• 2009-07-09 02:19 TARGET_OPTION_CAN_INLINE_P vs TARGET_CAN_INLINE_P
• 2009-07-10 00:45 Re: TARGET_OPTION_CAN_INLINE_P vs TARGET_CAN_INLINE_P
• 2009-07-10 05:03 Re: TARGET_OPTION_CAN_INLINE_P vs TARGET_CAN_INLINE_P
• 2009-07-14 20:12 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
• 2009-07-15 01:15 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
• 2009-07-16 23:19 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
• 2009-07-21 23:49 [mep] legitimizing control registers
• 2009-07-25 02:49 Re: Add crc32 function to libiberty
• 2009-07-29 03:30 is pr26565 broken again?

Dodji Seketeli

• 2009-07-03 15:31 Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native

Dominique Dhumieres

• 2009-07-02 09:20 Re: Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-02 10:08 Re: Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-02 13:11 Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-17 09:08 bootstrapping and regtesting 4.5 is much slower than 4.4.1

Dorit Nuzman

• 2009-07-28 18:44 Call for papers: 2nd Workshop on GCC Research Opportunities (GROW '10)

Douglas B Rupp

• 2009-07-12 19:30 Multiple calls to case NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG for same function?
• 2009-07-15 19:36 Re: Multiple calls to case NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG for same function?
• 2009-07-16 00:28 Re: Multiple calls to case NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG for same function?
• 2009-07-16 15:20 Re: Multiple calls to case NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG for same function?
• 2009-07-21 16:11 New port IA64 VMS and updated Alpha/VMS

ecrosbie

• 2009-07-07 21:37 random numbers

Ed Smith-Rowland

• 2009-07-28 14:48 Re: The future of concepts
• 2009-07-29 14:17 Re: [lambda] Segmentation fault in simple lambda program

eli

• 2009-07-15 09:16 SAVE ON YOUR TAXES LEGITAMITELY!

Eli Zaretskii

• 2009-07-03 10:04 -print-* command-line switches misbehave or are misdocumented
• 2009-07-05 03:21 Re: -print-* command-line switches misbehave or are misdocumented
• 2009-07-05 18:03 Re: -print-* command-line switches misbehave or are misdocumented

Eric Botcazou

• 2009-07-03 05:29 Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-13 23:52 Re: A question about df_get_live_in
• 2009-07-14 12:20 Re: A question about df_get_live_in

Eric Fisher

• 2009-07-16 08:14 Is GDE available for now?
• 2009-07-24 02:28 implement tree_peeling_loop

Florian Weimer

• 2009-07-25 20:53 Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-26 06:47 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-26 09:51 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-26 10:19 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-27 06:10 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-27 09:35 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-27 11:02 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2009-07-08 16:13 Re: VTA Linux kernel compilation comparison
• 2009-07-16 18:47 Re: Problem with static linking
• 2009-07-16 22:32 Re: how to use expand_builtin_alloca
• 2009-07-27 14:29 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4

FX

• 2009-07-30 10:25 [testsuite] Executing testcases under wine

Gabriel Paubert

• 2009-07-27 07:34 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-27 08:55 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model

gcc

• 2009-07-06 16:41 Becoming maintainer of FreeBSD x86_64 GNAT port

gccadmin

• 2009-07-02 22:46 gcc-4.5-20090702 is now available
• 2009-07-05 22:46 gcc-4.3-20090705 is now available
• 2009-07-07 22:49 gcc-4.4-20090707 is now available
• 2009-07-09 22:47 gcc-4.5-20090709 is now available
• 2009-07-12 22:45 gcc-4.3-20090712 is now available
• 2009-07-14 22:52 gcc-4.4-20090714 is now available
• 2009-07-16 22:51 gcc-4.5-20090716 is now available
• 2009-07-19 22:43 gcc-4.3-20090719 is now available
• 2009-07-21 22:50 gcc-4.4-20090721 is now available
• 2009-07-23 22:50 gcc-4.5-20090723 is now available
• 2009-07-26 22:44 gcc-4.3-20090726 is now available
• 2009-07-28 22:47 gcc-4.4-20090728 is now available
• 2009-07-30 22:47 gcc-4.5-20090730 is now available

Geoff Keating

• 2009-07-02 21:10 Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2009-07-24 20:02 Re: We shouldn't tell people to send e-mail to gcc-bugs

graham_k

• 2009-07-24 03:28 GPL (probably a FAQ)

Gregory Casamento

• 2009-07-21 19:47 Incorporation of Objective-C 2.0 changes into GCC trunk
• 2009-07-21 21:02 Re: Incorporation of Objective-C 2.0 changes into GCC trunk
• 2009-07-24 04:22 Re: GPL (probably a FAQ)

H.J. Lu

• 2009-07-07 13:31 Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline
• 2009-07-16 21:49 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.12 is released
• 2009-07-21 22:16 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.13 is released
• 2009-07-22 22:15 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.14 is released

Haitao Zhang

• 2009-07-01 04:47 -fstack-limit-register not work for ARM?

Hallvard B Furuseth

• 2009-07-07 22:06 optimizer hints for critical sections

Hayawardh V

• 2009-07-12 17:44 Regarding gcov instrumentation in gcc, tree-profile.c

Hendershot, Travis S

• 2009-07-13 12:29 GCC on Green Hills INTEGRITY

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2009-07-01 19:07 Re: A small (preprocessor) problem, and a modest enhancement proposal
• 2009-07-01 19:18 Re: -fstack-limit-register not work for ARM?
• 2009-07-02 00:33 Re: -fstack-limit-register not work for ARM?
• 2009-07-02 19:46 Re: About feasibility of implementing an instruction
• 2009-07-04 23:06 Re: -print-* command-line switches misbehave or are misdocumented
• 2009-07-04 23:11 Re: gtyp-input.list should contain absolute paths.
• 2009-07-06 06:14 Re: CONSTANT_POOL_BEFORE_FUNCTION has no effect in tm.h?
• 2009-07-06 17:01 Re: CONSTANT_POOL_BEFORE_FUNCTION has no effect in tm.h?
• 2009-07-06 18:07 Re: --with-host-libstdcxx doesn't work as expected
• 2009-07-06 18:45 Re: CONSTANT_POOL_BEFORE_FUNCTION has no effect in tm.h?
• 2009-07-07 13:28 Re: Internal Representation
• 2009-07-09 04:27 Re: avoiding gdb cc1plus PACK_EXPANSION_PATTERN(result) gives 'No symbol "__extension__"', error msg
• 2009-07-09 04:29 Re: TARGET_OPTION_CAN_INLINE_P vs TARGET_CAN_INLINE_P
• 2009-07-09 18:06 Re: Internal Representation
• 2009-07-09 18:12 Re: [SH] ICE compiling pr34330 testcase for sh-linux-gnu
• 2009-07-10 04:56 Re: TARGET_OPTION_CAN_INLINE_P vs TARGET_CAN_INLINE_P
• 2009-07-10 14:33 Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS vs CALL_REALLY_USED_REGISTERS
• 2009-07-10 23:38 Re: CONSTANT_POOL_BEFORE_FUNCTION has no effect in tm.h?
• 2009-07-13 05:43 Re: Information Assistance
• 2009-07-13 21:17 Re: how to use expand_builtin_alloca
• 2009-07-13 21:39 Re: how to use expand_builtin_alloca
• 2009-07-14 13:33 Re: template instantiation and anonymous namespaces
• 2009-07-14 19:53 Re: Adding constraints.md to my port
• 2009-07-16 02:08 Re: [gcc-in-cxx] zlib?
• 2009-07-16 03:25 Re: [gcc-in-cxx] zlib?
• 2009-07-16 03:42 Re: Problem with static linking
• 2009-07-16 17:42 Re: Is GDE available for now?
• 2009-07-16 17:57 Re: Problem with static linking
• 2009-07-18 17:07 Re: current_function_outgoing_args_size
• 2009-07-21 05:21 Re: Pre and post increment
• 2009-07-21 16:29 Re: New port IA64 VMS and updated Alpha/VMS
• 2009-07-23 06:47 Re: #pragma startup doesn't work on GCC
• 2009-07-23 17:15 We shouldn't tell people to send e-mail to gcc-bugs
• 2009-07-24 14:33 Re: libstdc++.so.6.0.*-gdb.py might be installed at the wrong place
• 2009-07-24 14:44 Re: GPL (probably a FAQ)
• 2009-07-24 15:19 Re: Building GCC
• 2009-07-24 15:27 Re: Modelling of multiple condition code registers

imap

• 2009-07-20 15:30 Pre and post increment
• 2009-07-20 15:49 Re: Pre and post increment
• 2009-07-21 04:43 Re: Pre and post increment

Jack Howarth

• 2009-07-12 19:41 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20000804-1.c -O0 with PIC on gcc-4_4-branch
• 2009-07-12 20:25 Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20000804-1.c -O0 with PIC on gcc-4_4-branch
• 2009-07-13 03:39 Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20000804-1.c -O0 with PIC on gcc-4_4-branch
• 2009-07-23 15:55 Re: Graphite Merge Expected in Mid/Late July

Jakub Jelinek

• 2009-07-03 10:15 VTA compile time memory usage comparison
• 2009-07-07 10:04 VTA compilation speed comparison
• 2009-07-07 10:08 VTA IL size comparison
• 2009-07-08 13:09 VTA Linux kernel compilation comparison
• 2009-07-08 16:18 Re: VTA Linux kernel compilation comparison
• 2009-07-15 14:48 GCC 4.4.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
• 2009-07-15 14:55 GCC 4.4.1 Status Report (2009-07-15)
• 2009-07-15 15:05 GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-07-15)
• 2009-07-16 08:16 Re: Problem with static linking
• 2009-07-22 09:57 GCC 4.4.2 Status Report (2009-07-22)

James Dennett

• 2009-07-28 10:05 Re: The future of concepts

Jan Hubicka

• 2009-07-11 12:59 Re: can_throw_internal affected by inlining?
• 2009-07-11 17:59 Re: can_throw_internal affected by inlining?
• 2009-07-11 18:53 Re: can_throw_internal affected by inlining?
• 2009-07-17 10:36 Re: can_throw_internal affected by inlining?
• 2009-07-23 17:28 Re: [trans-mem] cgraph edges vs function cloning
• 2009-07-24 13:43 Re: [lto]: mainline merge @149863
• 2009-07-28 17:16 Re: [trans-mem] cgraph edges vs function cloning
• 2009-07-29 06:43 Re: [trans-mem] cgraph edges vs function cloning

Janboe Ye

• 2009-07-13 21:08 how to use expand_builtin_alloca
• 2009-07-13 21:27 Re: how to use expand_builtin_alloca

Janis Johnson

• 2009-07-08 22:33 decimal float support for C++
• 2009-07-13 18:34 Re: Can't run gfortran testsuite
• 2009-07-14 17:36 Re: decimal float support for C++

Jason Merrill

• 2009-07-14 15:16 Re: decimal float support for C++
• 2009-07-14 18:24 Re: decimal float support for C++
• 2009-07-17 13:54 Re: The C++ FE drops qualifiers on pointer dereference
• 2009-07-23 13:45 Re: etags Makefile target useful?
• 2009-07-31 21:40 Re: The future of concepts

Jean Christophe Beyler

• 2009-07-01 15:36 Immediates propagated wrongly in stores
• 2009-07-01 18:28 Re: Immediates propagated wrongly in stores
• 2009-07-01 21:02 Re: Immediates propagated wrongly in stores
• 2009-07-06 17:16 Re: Immediates propagated wrongly in stores
• 2009-07-13 21:30 Re: Code optimization only in loops
• 2009-07-14 18:30 Adding constraints.md to my port
• 2009-07-14 20:01 Code optimization with GCSE
• 2009-07-14 20:31 Re: Adding constraints.md to my port
• 2009-07-15 15:21 Re: Code optimization with GCSE
• 2009-07-15 15:22 Re: Adding constraints.md to my port
• 2009-07-15 17:13 Re: Code optimization with GCSE

Jeff Law

• 2009-07-01 01:44 Re: Address mode offset spill
• 2009-07-01 01:45 Re: Address mode offset spill
• 2009-07-01 01:57 Re: 答复: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
• 2009-07-01 02:05 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
• 2009-07-01 02:06 Re: Base register restrictions
• 2009-07-01 02:12 Re: Any ideas how to get the IRA to choose one subclass of registers over another in the same cover class?
• 2009-07-01 02:14 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
• 2009-07-01 02:21 Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
• 2009-07-01 05:58 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
• 2009-07-01 06:06 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
• 2009-07-01 06:09 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism
• 2009-07-01 06:14 Re: How to deal with unrecognizable RTL code
• 2009-07-14 05:20 Re: A question about df_get_live_in

Jerry Quinn

• 2009-07-16 01:46 [gcc-in-cxx] zlib?
• 2009-07-16 02:25 Re: [gcc-in-cxx] zlib?

Joe Buck

• 2009-07-06 21:39 Re: -print-* command-line switches misbehave or are misdocumented
• 2009-07-26 01:57 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-26 21:51 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-28 00:57 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4

Joel Sherrill

• 2009-07-03 18:48 g-socket.adb error
• 2009-07-06 15:14 Re: g-socket.adb error

Joern Rennecke

• 2009-07-30 14:32 Re: [SH] ICE compiling pr34330 testcase for sh-linux-gnu

Jonathan Wakely

• 2009-07-28 19:18 Re: The future of concepts

Joseph S. Myers

• 2009-07-14 19:27 Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline
• 2009-07-15 19:36 Re: [plugin] Directory for plugins distributed with gcc
• 2009-07-15 20:53 Re: [plugin] Directory for plugins distributed with gcc
• 2009-07-24 11:25 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-24 11:52 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-24 18:59 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-29 23:40 GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-07-29)
• 2009-07-30 16:27 Targets still needing stdint.h type information

Jun Sun

• 2009-07-01 22:05 Re: -fstack-limit-register not work for ARM?

Kai Ruottu

• 2009-07-23 12:13 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on ARM/WinCE float problem

Kai Tietz

• 2009-07-18 16:01 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-18 17:27 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-18 19:23 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-18 19:27 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-19 11:13 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-19 13:31 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-19 13:55 Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
• 2009-07-19 17:20 Re: Can I have some basic BZ perms please?
• 2009-07-22 19:18 RFA: Issues to enable x86 defaulted multilib version
• 2009-07-23 15:19 Re: RFA: Issues to enable x86 defaulted multilib version
• 2009-07-24 09:20 [patch libjava]: Add missing file for Win32
• 2009-07-29 09:41 Re: GCC 4.3.4 release candidate available

Kallman

• 2009-07-02 20:03 Pagan sex - sexual Positons That Work

Kaveh R. GHAZI

• 2009-07-08 07:15 Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline

Kaz Kojima

• 2009-07-13 21:46 A question about df_get_live_in
• 2009-07-13 23:17 Re: A question about df_get_live_in
• 2009-07-14 00:13 Re: A question about df_get_live_in
• 2009-07-14 12:50 Re: A question about df_get_live_in

Ken Raeburn

• 2009-07-02 13:37 Re: Endianess attribute
• 2009-07-02 23:55 Re: Endianess attribute

Larry Evans

• 2009-07-01 09:53 Re: howto configure so that CFLAGS='-g3 -O0' in gcc/Makefile?
• 2009-07-08 21:53 avoiding gdb cc1plus PACK_EXPANSION_PATTERN(result) gives 'No symbol "__extension__"', error msg
• 2009-07-12 15:27 [gdb]howto specify breakpoints with gdb convenience variables
• 2009-07-12 17:38 Re: [gdb]howto specify breakpoints with gdb convenience variables
• 2009-07-23 12:08 etags Makefile target useful?
• 2009-07-23 16:25 Re: etags Makefile target useful?

Laurent GUERBY

• 2009-07-03 13:58 Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-04 11:16 Re: g-socket.adb error
• 2009-07-24 16:25 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-25 15:42 Re: Any ada maintainers out there this afternoon? (Ada bootstrap broken on newlib targets)
• 2009-07-27 08:47 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-27 13:42 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-27 15:00 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-30 12:52 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-07-29)

Li Feng

• 2009-07-14 06:01 How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-14 09:12 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-15 07:59 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-16 09:00 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-17 01:36 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p

Luis Machado

• 2009-07-21 13:59 Re: Incorrect line info in printf for powerpc-eabisim -mhard-foat
• 2009-07-21 14:04 Re: Incorrect line info in printf for powerpc-eabisim -mhard-foat

Maciej Cencora

• 2009-07-10 11:48 Possible bug in g++ - template specialization

Maik Beckmann

• 2009-07-08 19:18 Re: Graphite build fails if PPL configured with --disable-shared

Makoto Fujiwara

• 2009-07-16 08:47 Preserve registers across function call (Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS)
• 2009-07-17 09:17 Re: Preserve registers across function call (Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS)

Mark Mielke

• 2009-07-24 03:48 Re: GPL (probably a FAQ)

Mark Mitchell

• 2009-07-05 21:50 Graphite Merge Expected in Mid/Late July
• 2009-07-15 01:09 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
• 2009-07-27 17:50 Re: removing -Wtraditional-conversion

Markus L

• 2009-07-24 08:47 Modelling of multiple condition code registers

Martin Guy

• 2009-07-24 12:06 Re: putc vs. fputc

Martin Jambor

• 2009-07-29 07:27 Re: [trans-mem] cgraph edges vs function cloning

Martin Kicko

• 2009-07-02 12:55 Donate for text link
• 2009-07-02 12:58 Donate for text link

Maxim Kuvyrkov

• 2009-07-15 06:39 Re: [SH] ICE compiling pr34330 testcase for sh-linux-gnu

Michael Eager

• 2009-07-16 20:56 Incorrect line info in printf for powerpc-eabisim -mhard-foat
• 2009-07-23 18:40 Re: Incorrect line info in printf for powerpc-eabisim -mhard-foat
• 2009-07-27 16:41 Xilinx MicroBlaze port

Michael Hope

• 2009-07-21 02:22 Changing the order when generating a spill address
• 2009-07-24 04:22 Picking between alternative ways of expanding a section

Michael Meissner

• 2009-07-02 20:44 Re: Endianess attribute
• 2009-07-03 13:36 Re: Endianess attribute

mike dot power200 at gmail dot com

• 2009-07-03 23:48 Is there any pointers you might have What are the pros and cons I should be looking out for Any info much appreciated Thank you very much John

Mohamed Shafi

• 2009-07-02 04:59 About feasibility of implementing an instruction
• 2009-07-10 06:38 CALL_USED_REGISTERS vs CALL_REALLY_USED_REGISTERS
• 2009-07-13 14:35 Function argument passing
• 2009-07-18 08:49 Output sections
• 2009-07-18 12:44 current_function_outgoing_args_size
• 2009-07-20 05:22 Re: current_function_outgoing_args_size
• 2009-07-31 13:42 Re: Output sections

Nathan Froyd

• 2009-07-24 12:36 Re: Gimple Pass

Nicholas Sherlock

• 2009-07-19 03:35 Re: Order To New Zealand

Nicolas COLLIN

• 2009-07-07 11:26 Internal Representation
• 2009-07-09 06:58 Internal Representation

NightStrike

• 2009-07-10 16:14 Re: Can't run gfortran testsuite
• 2009-07-12 19:41 Re: Can't run gfortran testsuite

Olatunji Ruwase

• 2009-07-15 18:51 Re: [plugin] Directory for plugins distributed with gcc

Olivier Hainque

• 2009-07-01 11:03 pa-hpux bootstrap failure after "post-cond-optab improvements"
• 2009-07-01 12:22 Re: pa-hpux bootstrap failure after "post-cond-optab improvements"
• 2009-07-02 16:49 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT vs g++ compat test expectation on aix ?

Paolo Bonzini

• 2009-07-01 11:21 Re: pa-hpux bootstrap failure after "post-cond-optab improvements"
• 2009-07-01 12:04 Re: pa-hpux bootstrap failure after "post-cond-optab improvements"
• 2009-07-02 11:18 Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-02 13:37 Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-02 21:23 Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-03 05:43 Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-03 11:47 Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-15 05:29 Re: Code optimization with GCSE
• 2009-07-15 05:30 Re: Adding constraints.md to my port
• 2009-07-15 06:25 Re: updating autotools status
• 2009-07-15 20:43 Re: [plugin] Directory for plugins distributed with gcc
• 2009-07-15 21:43 Re: [plugin] Directory for plugins distributed with gcc
• 2009-07-21 19:50 Re: Incorporation of Objective-C 2.0 changes into GCC trunk
• 2009-07-21 21:14 Re: Incorporation of Objective-C 2.0 changes into GCC trunk
• 2009-07-22 09:58 Re: Incorporation of Objective-C 2.0 changes into GCC trunk
• 2009-07-22 16:48 Re: Incorporation of Objective-C 2.0 changes into GCC trunk
• 2009-07-23 09:26 Re: RFA: Issues to enable x86 defaulted multilib version
• 2009-07-25 16:54 Re: Bootstrap failure configuring in-tree gmp in mainline
• 2009-07-25 18:26 Re: Bootstrap failure configuring in-tree gmp in mainline
• 2009-07-27 07:08 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-27 10:10 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-27 13:32 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-27 21:47 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4

Paul Chavent

• 2009-07-02 09:59 Endianess attribute

Paul Edwards

• 2009-07-18 11:28 Re: i370 port

Peter Bergner

• 2009-07-21 13:53 Re: Incorrect line info in printf for powerpc-eabisim -mhard-foat

Piotr Wyderski

• 2009-07-28 10:01 The future of concepts

pms

• 2009-07-24 12:20 Gimple Pass
• 2009-07-25 11:28 Re: Gimple Pass

Rafael Espindola

• 2009-07-07 14:03 Re: preprocessors & GCC plugins
• 2009-07-16 13:09 Re: [plugin] Directory for plugins distributed with gcc

Rainer Emrich

• 2009-07-06 17:38 --with-host-libstdcxx doesn't work as expected
• 2009-07-07 08:15 gcc-trunk bootstrap failure in libjava on i686-pc-cygwin
• 2009-07-20 19:25 default library search path for native *-w64-mingw32 builds is broken somehow
• 2009-07-22 15:22 Re: default library search path for native *-w64-mingw32 builds is broken somehow
• 2009-07-26 21:12 trunk bootstrap failure in libgfortran for i686-pc-cygwin

Rajeshwari Bhat

• 2009-07-14 05:38 Re: Help on Porting GCC to a new architecture

Ralf Wildenhues

• 2009-07-03 12:47 Re: gtyp-input.list should contain absolute paths.
• 2009-07-04 09:15 Re: gtyp-input.list should contain absolute paths.
• 2009-07-09 13:07 Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
• 2009-07-09 15:07 Re: libiberty should be a shared library when cc1 has plugin enabled.
• 2009-07-21 06:41 Re: updating autotools status
• 2009-07-25 11:18 Re: Bootstrap failure configuring in-tree gmp in mainline
• 2009-07-26 07:48 Re: Failure in a complete build of current gcc snapshot
• 2009-07-26 07:57 Re: Failure in a complete build of current gcc snapshot
• 2009-07-26 08:09 Re: Failure in a complete build of current gcc snapshot
• 2009-07-27 20:21 Re: Failure in a complete build of current gcc snapshot
• 2009-07-28 04:46 Re: Failure in a complete build of current gcc snapshot

Rayne

• 2009-07-31 05:06 Difference between Windows and Linux GCC compiler

Revital1 Eres

• 2009-07-19 06:18 Vectorizing invariant data-ref
• 2009-07-19 09:42 Re: Vectorizing invariant data-ref

Richard Earnshaw

• 2009-07-13 10:43 Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline

Richard Guenther

• 2009-07-02 09:36 Re: Re: GCC build failure, HEAD@149166 on native
• 2009-07-02 11:26 Re: -f[no-]finite-math-only
• 2009-07-02 13:26 Re: Aliasing bug
• 2009-07-02 13:34 Re: Aliasing bug
• 2009-07-02 15:23 Re: Aliasing bug
• 2009-07-05 10:11 Re: gtyp-input.list should contain absolute paths.
• 2009-07-07 13:37 Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline
• 2009-07-09 14:37 Re: Strange Performance Hit on 2D-Loop
• 2009-07-10 12:44 Re: Possible bug in g++ - template specialization
• 2009-07-12 19:55 Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20000804-1.c -O0 with PIC on gcc-4_4-branch
• 2009-07-13 07:32 Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20000804-1.c -O0 with PIC on gcc-4_4-branch
• 2009-07-13 08:23 Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20000804-1.c -O0 with PIC on gcc-4_4-branch
• 2009-07-13 12:46 Re: GCC on Green Hills INTEGRITY
• 2009-07-14 08:54 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-14 09:40 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-14 15:26 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-14 21:34 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-15 11:26 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-15 20:46 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-15 20:49 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-16 08:39 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-16 09:16 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-17 09:13 Re: bootstrapping and regtesting 4.5 is much slower than 4.4.1
• 2009-07-17 13:26 The C++ FE drops qualifiers on pointer dereference
• 2009-07-18 12:26 Re: array semantic query
• 2009-07-19 09:17 Re: Vectorizing invariant data-ref
• 2009-07-19 17:20 Re: Can I have some basic BZ perms please?
• 2009-07-22 08:57 Re: Incorporation of Objective-C 2.0 changes into GCC trunk
• 2009-07-25 09:28 Re: merging VTA: what does it take?
• 2009-07-25 11:42 Re: Gimple Pass
• 2009-07-27 13:25 GCC 4.3.4 Status Report (2009-07-27), branch frozen
• 2009-07-27 16:12 GCC 4.3.4 release candidate available
• 2009-07-29 09:39 Re: GCC 4.3.4 release candidate available
• 2009-07-31 10:22 Re: [gimple] ICE "verify_gimple error"

Richard Henderson

• 2009-07-01 16:23 Re: Immediates propagated wrongly in stores
• 2009-07-01 19:27 Re: Immediates propagated wrongly in stores
• 2009-07-01 21:34 Re: Immediates propagated wrongly in stores
• 2009-07-01 22:19 Re: gcc and x86 condition codes
• 2009-07-07 16:28 Re: Can GCC scheduler take advantage of mutually exclusive predicated blocks?
• 2009-07-08 22:14 Re: avoiding gdb cc1plus PACK_EXPANSION_PATTERN(result) gives 'No symbol "__extension__"', error msg
• 2009-07-10 22:58 can_throw_internal affected by inlining?
• 2009-07-11 17:44 Re: can_throw_internal affected by inlining?
• 2009-07-11 18:09 Re: can_throw_internal affected by inlining?
• 2009-07-15 17:57 Re: Multiple calls to case NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG for same function?
• 2009-07-15 18:55 Re: Function argument passing
• 2009-07-16 15:09 Re: Multiple calls to case NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG for same function?
• 2009-07-16 15:26 Re: Preserve registers across function call (Re: CALL_USED_REGISTERS)
• 2009-07-16 17:09 Re: can_throw_internal affected by inlining?
• 2009-07-23 01:39 [trans-mem] cgraph edges vs function cloning
• 2009-07-23 20:59 Re: [trans-mem] cgraph edges vs function cloning
• 2009-07-27 23:08 Re: [trans-mem] cgraph edges vs function cloning
• 2009-07-28 17:44 Re: [trans-mem] cgraph edges vs function cloning
• 2009-07-28 23:26 Re: [trans-mem] cgraph edges vs function cloning
• 2009-07-29 16:24 Re: [trans-mem] cgraph edges vs function cloning

Richard Kenner

• 2009-07-27 13:00 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model

Robert Dewar

• 2009-07-24 16:04 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-24 16:10 Re: GPL (probably a FAQ)
• 2009-07-24 19:25 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-25 15:26 Re: Any ada maintainers out there this afternoon? (Ada bootstrap broken on newlib targets)
• 2009-07-25 15:28 Re: Any ada maintainers out there this afternoon? (Ada bootstrap broken on newlib targets)
• 2009-07-25 15:50 Re: Any ada maintainers out there this afternoon? (Ada bootstrap broken on newlib targets)
• 2009-07-27 10:07 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-27 10:24 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-27 10:26 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-27 10:27 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-27 12:10 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-27 12:12 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4
• 2009-07-27 14:29 Re: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model

Robert Oeffner

• 2009-07-30 22:58 Porting GCC 4.4.0 to interix

Robert Seacord

• 2009-07-24 08:13 As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model
• 2009-07-25 11:10 RE: As-if Infinitely Ranged Integer Model

Ronald F. Guilmette

• 2009-07-01 04:28 A small (preprocessor) problem, and a modest enhancement proposal

Ross Ridge

• 2009-07-25 02:39 Re: Add crc32 function to libiberty

Russ Allbery

• 2009-07-28 00:34 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4

Sebastian Pop

• 2009-07-14 15:14 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-14 16:03 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-14 16:09 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-16 16:04 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-23 16:23 Re: Graphite Merge Expected in Mid/Late July

Shobaki, Ghassan

• 2009-07-20 23:12 Running a Single GCC Test Case

Stefan Lampe

• 2009-07-14 08:05 template instantiation and anonymous namespaces

Steven Bosscher

• 2009-07-02 21:35 Re: -frename-registers bug?
• 2009-07-13 22:08 Re: A question about df_get_live_in
• 2009-07-13 23:37 Re: A question about df_get_live_in
• 2009-07-24 21:57 Re: How to figure out the gcc -dP output?
• 2009-07-27 22:04 Re: How to figure out the gcc -dP output?
• 2009-07-30 15:59 Re: ARM conditional instruction optimisation bug (feature?)
• 2009-07-30 16:01 Re: ARM conditional instruction optimisation bug (feature?)

sumanth

• 2009-07-14 05:51 Re: Help on Porting GCC to a new architecture
• 2009-07-30 14:53 extern variable

Thomas Quinot

• 2009-07-06 15:03 Re: g-socket.adb error
• 2009-07-06 15:37 Re: g-socket.adb error

Tim Crook

• 2009-07-24 20:35 How to figure out the gcc -dP output?
• 2009-07-28 14:44 RE: How to figure out the gcc -dP output?

Tim Prince

• 2009-07-07 22:01 Re: random numbers
• 2009-07-07 22:08 Re: random numbers

Tobias Burnus

• 2009-07-27 07:23 Re: trunk bootstrap failure in libgfortran for i686-pc-cygwin

Tobias Grosser

• 2009-07-15 11:02 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-15 19:16 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p
• 2009-07-15 23:16 Re: How could I get alias set information from data_reference_p

Tom Tromey

• 2009-07-09 16:16 Re: avoiding gdb cc1plus PACK_EXPANSION_PATTERN(result) gives 'No symbol "__extension__"', error msg
• 2009-07-12 19:01 Re: [gdb]howto specify breakpoints with gdb convenience variables
• 2009-07-23 16:00 Re: etags Makefile target useful?
• 2009-07-24 15:51 Re: libstdc++.so.6.0.*-gdb.py might be installed at the wrong place
• 2009-07-27 16:04 Re: Failure in a complete build of current gcc snapshot
• 2009-07-30 21:17 Re: MELT tutorial on the wiki
• 2009-07-31 17:52 Re: MELT tutorial on the wiki
• 2009-07-31 20:16 Re: MELT tutorial on the wiki

Trevor Scroggins

• 2009-07-05 20:56 CONSTANT_POOL_BEFORE_FUNCTION has no effect in tm.h?
• 2009-07-06 16:29 Re: CONSTANT_POOL_BEFORE_FUNCTION has no effect in tm.h?
• 2009-07-06 17:11 Re: CONSTANT_POOL_BEFORE_FUNCTION has no effect in tm.h?
• 2009-07-06 18:29 Re: CONSTANT_POOL_BEFORE_FUNCTION has no effect in tm.h?
• 2009-07-10 22:19 Re: CONSTANT_POOL_BEFORE_FUNCTION has no effect in tm.h?
• 2009-07-10 22:20 Fwd: CONSTANT_POOL_BEFORE_FUNCTION has no effect in tm.h?
• 2009-07-10 23:48 Re: CONSTANT_POOL_BEFORE_FUNCTION has no effect in tm.h?

Ulrich Weigand

• 2009-07-20 14:27 Re: i370 port

Uros Bizjak

• 2009-07-24 08:37 putc vs. fputc
• 2009-07-24 12:41 Re: putc vs. fputc

Vikram KS

• 2009-07-30 14:05 need help on GCC driver
• 2009-07-31 04:37 Re: need help on GCC driver

Vincent Lefevre

• 2009-07-26 07:12 Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4

Vincent R.

• 2009-07-23 13:08 Re: gcc 4.4.0 on ARM/WinCE float problem

Vladimir Makarov

• 2009-07-02 21:53 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism

Yapparova Lilya

• 2009-07-02 13:05 question about gcc compiler

ye janboe

• 2009-07-19 20:08 Re: how to use expand_builtin_alloca

Zachary Turner

• 2009-07-09 04:00 GCC/G++ Integration with MSVC
• 2009-07-16 02:37 Problem with static linking
• 2009-07-16 20:08 Re: Problem with static linking
• 2009-07-20 16:12 Re: Pre and post increment

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)