This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.

From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:30:36 +0100
Subject: Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.
References: <49A7ECEF.8060305@gmail.com> <200902272134.42410.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <20090228112444.GA25166@adacore.com> <200902281820.48221.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

> I doubt that this can be deemed an experiment, we know that it works.

We know that it works with our sources and GCC 4.3. We have no idea how
well it works with GCC 4.4: we don't do mingw builds there.

> It's not just cygwin, it's also mingw.  The Ada compiler is quite broken on 
> Windows since 4.3 because of the merge glitch.

The merge glitch should be fixed, no doubt about that.

But I'm against doing more than fixing the merge glitch at this stage.

Arno

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.
  - From: Arnaud Charlet
- Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.
  - From: Arnaud Charlet
- Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]