This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Default warnings and useless extensions (e.g. arithmetic on void *)

From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc at vinc17 dot org>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:03:36 +0200
Subject: Re: Default warnings and useless extensions (e.g. arithmetic on void *)
References: <20080609134606.GB3299@vin.lip.ens-lyon.fr> <84fc9c000806090702i3e361340l26c5e6f351b47343@mail.gmail.com> <20080610070707.GB28426@prunille.vinc17.org> <484E5B57.7000105@sbcglobal.net> <20080610122924.GH4728@prunille.vinc17.org> <484E7648.1060908@adacore.com>

On 2008-06-10 08:40:40 -0400, Robert Dewar wrote:
> Clearly if everyone agreed that an extension was useless it would
> not be there, so this argument makes no sense to me.

Any example?

BTW, there should still be the possibility to use __extension__ to
avoid the warning.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

References:
- Default warnings and useless extensions (e.g. arithmetic on void *)
  - From: Vincent Lefevre
- Re: Default warnings and useless extensions (e.g. arithmetic on void *)
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Default warnings and useless extensions (e.g. arithmetic on void *)
  - From: Vincent Lefevre
- Re: Default warnings and useless extensions (e.g. arithmetic on void *)
  - From: Tim Prince
- Re: Default warnings and useless extensions (e.g. arithmetic on void *)
  - From: Vincent Lefevre
- Re: Default warnings and useless extensions (e.g. arithmetic on void *)
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]