This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 2008-06-10 06:45:43 -0400, Tim Prince wrote:long long is an extension, if you don't specify -std=c99.
I know that. But I can't use -std=c99 because it doesn't work with old gcc versions.
You ask for warnings about extensions, you get them.
No, I'm not asking warnings about extensions. I'm asking warnings about *useless* extensions, i.e. those for which a portable workaround is possible, e.g. replace p + 1 by (char *) p + 1 when p is a void *.
Clearly if everyone agreed that an extension was useless it would not be there, so this argument makes no sense to me.
Why didn't you post this on gcc-help?
Because this is a feature request.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |