This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> volatile can be properly used _only_ if you also assume atomicity and > cache-coherence, and this is beyond POSIX. But anyway, I'm proving > the opposite: when you use POSIX locks, you don't have to use > volatile, that it. We're not talking about locks, see the example you gave in your first message. -- Eric Botcazou
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |