Re: g++ 4.3.0 error: changes meaning

["Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk at yahoo dot com>]

Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Yes it is intentional.  It is an extension of an already existing
> error with non templates.  The code is invalid, though the C++
> standard does make a mention, this does not have to be diagnostic.

Thanks for the quick reply! This is great, I like the change since it
enforces improved readability. However, I anticipate that many people
will have to make changes. Specifically, I have to go into the
Boost.Python sources. If people ask about my changes, it would help
if I could point them to some gcc resource. For example, could the
"Changes" page at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html be updated
to mention the new error?

Thanks!
        Ralf





      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image.  Join our Network Research Panel today!   http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7